Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
I'm not really embarrassed about anything I like because I think it's cool to like all kinds of stuff. I
wish I could be as generous as Mess about movies but like PK was saying there's gotta be some
kind of hook that draws me in. With more recent films I find that hook is really hard to find. I like a
lot of stuff that would considered crap I'm sure. I like Hammer films (the old horror stuff) and they
are pretty goofy I guess. I love old Spielberg stuff like Jaws, Close Encounters, and even 1941. I like
all the old crazy comedies like Animal House, Caddyshack, Used Cars, The Blues Brothers, even
Neighbors...which is a film I know a lot of people think sucks. I like a Robin Williams film from the
80's called The Survivors which is about gun nuts and may have been Williams first film and I think
it is the one that made me laugh more than any other. I think that film is pretty much thought to be
a piece of shit by most people. I'll watch an older film (meaning pre-1990) in most cases before I'll
watch something more recent. Stuff like Old School, which I was forced to watch at a party, I just
feel like it's a cheap rip off of Animal House and nowhere near as funny. When I'm watching
something like that I feel like, why watch this when I could watch Animal House and really laugh my
ass off. I guess it bugs me. I mean if you are going to spend millions on making a film for the love
of god do something original or at least show some effort. Old School was just terrible in my book
and as I was watching it I wanted to do a Belushi (rather than the guitar) and pick up the dvd player
and smash it to pieces. Hand a piece of it back to my pal Molly and say "Sorry." The "I feel like I've seen this before" factor with new films is a big problem. Also I think new films
are tested too much to please the widest range of people and things are so watered down that they
are all so bland...it's impossible to sit through most of them. They do nothing to challenge the
audience they just serve the same thing again and again. Watch a recent film with a stop watch in
hand and I don't care if it's a comedy, horror film, action...whatever...there is a strict guideline it
seems you must follow that there has to be gag/laugh/punchline, creepy moment/something
jumps out/loud noise/scare, explosion/gunshot/fight/car chase every so many seconds. Like if a
minute passes without one of these things happening you've lost the audience and blown the whole
film. I like there to be a rhythm to a film and some kind of organic flow but the shit today is like
listening to a junk drum machine stuck on 4/4 time. One two,three, laugh. One two three, jump.
One two three, boom! They can shove that shit all day long as far as I'm concerned. It's probably
greatly due to television and how they have formatted everything because it must fit a strict time
frame but why does this have to bleed over into films? Have you ever been in the next room while
somebody is watching a sitcom and you hear the laugh track kick in every thirty seconds? It's like
clockwork. Lee, you probably know better than anybody.I honestly can't watch television shows because the rhythm fucks me up. I feel like I'm being
pushed around. Maybe I'm alone in this...it is kinda weird I admit. I swear it's not that I'm some kind
of snob about tv and I want to sit around and read philosophy all day...I feel uncomfortable
watching it...or maybe more so hearing it. The sound does bother me...it's very pushy is about all I
can think of right now to describe it. I did see Youth Without Youth and I liked it. It's not great but at least he presents a lot of
interesting ideas and it's beautifully shot. Tim Roth is very good in it too. I am rambling here...
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
Reg
(view)
I'm not really embarrassed about anything I like because I think it's cool to like all kinds of stuff. I
wish I could be as generous as Mess about movies but like PK was saying there's gotta be some
kind of hook that draws me in. With more recent films I find that hook is really hard to find. I like a
lot of stuff that would considered crap I'm sure. I like Hammer films (the old horror stuff) and they
are pretty goofy I guess. I love old Spielberg stuff like Jaws, Close Encounters, and even 1941. I like
all the old crazy comedies like Animal House, Caddyshack, Used Cars, The Blues Brothers, even
Neighbors...which is a film I know a lot of people think sucks. I like a Robin Williams film from the
80's called The Survivors which is about gun nuts and may have been Williams first film and I think
it is the one that made me laugh more than any other. I think that film is pretty much thought to be
a piece of shit by most people. I'll watch an older film (meaning pre-1990) in most cases before I'll
watch something more recent. Stuff like Old School, which I was forced to watch at a party, I just
feel like it's a cheap rip off of Animal House and nowhere near as funny. When I'm watching
something like that I feel like, why watch this when I could watch Animal House and really laugh my
ass off. I guess it bugs me. I mean if you are going to spend millions on making a film for the love
of god do something original or at least show some effort. Old School was just terrible in my book
and as I was watching it I wanted to do a Belushi (rather than the guitar) and pick up the dvd player
and smash it to pieces. Hand a piece of it back to my pal Molly and say "Sorry." The "I feel like I've seen this before" factor with new films is a big problem. Also I think new films
are tested too much to please the widest range of people and things are so watered down that they
are all so bland...it's impossible to sit through most of them. They do nothing to challenge the
audience they just serve the same thing again and again. Watch a recent film with a stop watch in
hand and I don't care if it's a comedy, horror film, action...whatever...there is a strict guideline it
seems you must follow that there has to be gag/laugh/punchline, creepy moment/something
jumps out/loud noise/scare, explosion/gunshot/fight/car chase every so many seconds. Like if a
minute passes without one of these things happening you've lost the audience and blown the whole
film. I like there to be a rhythm to a film and some kind of organic flow but the shit today is like
listening to a junk drum machine stuck on 4/4 time. One two,three, laugh. One two three, jump.
One two three, boom! They can shove that shit all day long as far as I'm concerned. It's probably
greatly due to television and how they have formatted everything because it must fit a strict time
frame but why does this have to bleed over into films? Have you ever been in the next room while
somebody is watching a sitcom and you hear the laugh track kick in every thirty seconds? It's like
clockwork. Lee, you probably know better than anybody.I honestly can't watch television shows because the rhythm fucks me up. I feel like I'm being
pushed around. Maybe I'm alone in this...it is kinda weird I admit. I swear it's not that I'm some kind
of snob about tv and I want to sit around and read philosophy all day...I feel uncomfortable
watching it...or maybe more so hearing it. The sound does bother me...it's very pushy is about all I
can think of right now to describe it. I did see Youth Without Youth and I liked it. It's not great but at least he presents a lot of
interesting ideas and it's beautifully shot. Tim Roth is very good in it too. I am rambling here...
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
