|
Ok, I'll answer those questions: etc Fair enough My answer to this is etc: Whoa Nellie that was a mouthful. So you think this was all just a power play by Bush? Lets line the pockets of the good ole boys at Halliburton and implement electronic an global eavesdropping for shits and grins. No. Lets also get every yahoo dumbass that never took the time to read their own birth certificate to agree with us. It wont be hard they're just a bunch of mic, wap, spic, kraut, bastards. If you are asking if I think certain action needs to be taken etc: borders even more porous...seriously, what do you think their "War on Terror" is? True enough that Bush has been a pussy on securing the borders but we've got wetbacks picketing for rights for Christsakes. They need drivers licenses and guaranteed health benefits. And neither side is willing to enforce the existing laws and for people that stand up and say yes we should are branded racists. So if we do enforce the borders there will be wetback carnage. True enough for a (see the above options) from Texas. Don't know if you've been keeping up with the news but the tide is turning and we are making progress much to the chagrin of the MSM The tide always turns prior to a tsunami. We may as well line them up on the White House lawn etc: Hmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnn. And what happens when the policemen go away? So you think we should be the worlds police? Don't you know that 90% of police officers are large athletes who didn't make it to the pros? Even after the roides. Well if you are talking about etc: Ahhh thanks Reg you used the magic word Policy which means the next word is..... yes you guessed it Diplomacy. Whattya say we put Jimbo Carter in charge of taking care of that? This response is just plain ignorant. Basically to start "winning" etc: Well Diplomacy again. Somehow I missed the part of that when I was watching these guys kill in the name of Allah. We could send Madeline HalfBright to negotiate. Mady would kick the shit out of Condi and stuff her up Cheny's Ass. Which would fit quite easily after all that time with Jeff Gannon. I believe there are a lot of unanswered questions etc: At least you are honest. Misguided but honest. The real question is what is considered to be "Inside" This is actually my favorite question etc: Stop hold it right there Reg, you have made your best point ever. Oh my god you have hit the nail on the head. Why has this thing dragged on? Why Reg why. And why did'nt WWII. And listen up PKJenson who posted below here. Once the Atomic Bomb had been dropped it became oh so apparent that we were no longer fucking around. We did not go through 4 committees and a review board to get something done. Our biggest stumbling block is that someone might get caught waterboarding to get some information. The only thing holding us back is us. We have to get over the fact that there is going to be collateral damage. Reg between the press, Congress and the ACLU we are never going to win this thing. We can't because we don't have the stomach for it. I actually agree with this. If you don't have the stomach to be responsible for anhialating a population, you have no business going to war. You probably should resort to another tactic.(See Above) Who gave the orders for Fat Man and Little Boy? Was it FDR? I've always felt it wasn't important when you finish. It's only important when you start. When it comes to the US starting to realize that there are other people in the world that might get a bit aggitated by being manipulated for their resorces, labor, young nubile children, and that over a period of say a 100 #*^#@$%@!YEARS you don't expect some possible retaliation? That's why starting is the important thing. If you want to stop terrorists that's fine, Pat, etc: So we send in Special Ops to take care of this? They're already there. I think you should join them. With your help I'm sure I'm sure all the resistance will majically dissapear. No I saw the post header and am reading it now Typical -- | |
| posts: 2205 (history) |
Posted on - 11/10/2007 12:54:27 AM |
[view all posts]
|
Ok, I'll answer those questions: etc Fair enough My answer to this is etc: Whoa Nellie that was a mouthful. So you think this was all just a power play by Bush? Lets line the pockets of the good ole boys at Halliburton and implement electronic an global eavesdropping for shits and grins. No. Lets also get every yahoo dumbass that never took the time to read their own birth certificate to agree with us. It wont be hard they're just a bunch of mic, wap, spic, kraut, bastards. If you are asking if I think certain action needs to be taken etc: borders even more porous...seriously, what do you think their "War on Terror" is? True enough that Bush has been a pussy on securing the borders but we've got wetbacks picketing for rights for Christsakes. They need drivers licenses and guaranteed health benefits. And neither side is willing to enforce the existing laws and for people that stand up and say yes we should are branded racists. So if we do enforce the borders there will be wetback carnage. True enough for a (see the above options) from Texas. Don't know if you've been keeping up with the news but the tide is turning and we are making progress much to the chagrin of the MSM The tide always turns prior to a tsunami. We may as well line them up on the White House lawn etc: Hmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnn. And what happens when the policemen go away? So you think we should be the worlds police? Don't you know that 90% of police officers are large athletes who didn't make it to the pros? Even after the roides. Well if you are talking about etc: Ahhh thanks Reg you used the magic word Policy which means the next word is..... yes you guessed it Diplomacy. Whattya say we put Jimbo Carter in charge of taking care of that? This response is just plain ignorant. Basically to start "winning" etc: Well Diplomacy again. Somehow I missed the part of that when I was watching these guys kill in the name of Allah. We could send Madeline HalfBright to negotiate. Mady would kick the shit out of Condi and stuff her up Cheny's Ass. Which would fit quite easily after all that time with Jeff Gannon. I believe there are a lot of unanswered questions etc: At least you are honest. Misguided but honest. The real question is what is considered to be "Inside" This is actually my favorite question etc: Stop hold it right there Reg, you have made your best point ever. Oh my god you have hit the nail on the head. Why has this thing dragged on? Why Reg why. And why did'nt WWII. And listen up PKJenson who posted below here. Once the Atomic Bomb had been dropped it became oh so apparent that we were no longer fucking around. We did not go through 4 committees and a review board to get something done. Our biggest stumbling block is that someone might get caught waterboarding to get some information. The only thing holding us back is us. We have to get over the fact that there is going to be collateral damage. Reg between the press, Congress and the ACLU we are never going to win this thing. We can't because we don't have the stomach for it. I actually agree with this. If you don't have the stomach to be responsible for anhialating a population, you have no business going to war. You probably should resort to another tactic.(See Above) Who gave the orders for Fat Man and Little Boy? Was it FDR? I've always felt it wasn't important when you finish. It's only important when you start. When it comes to the US starting to realize that there are other people in the world that might get a bit aggitated by being manipulated for their resorces, labor, young nubile children, and that over a period of say a 100 #*^#@$%@!YEARS you don't expect some possible retaliation? That's why starting is the important thing. If you want to stop terrorists that's fine, Pat, etc: So we send in Special Ops to take care of this? They're already there. I think you should join them. With your help I'm sure I'm sure all the resistance will majically dissapear. No I saw the post header and am reading it now Typical -- | |
| posts: 2205 (history) |
Posted on - 11/10/2007 12:54:27 AM |
[view all posts]
-
Pat Brown right all along about the MSM...Selling us a war... – Reg on November 9th, 2007-
Questions for Reg – PatBrown on November 9th, 2007-
Re: Questions for Reg – Reg on November 9th, 2007-
Re: Questions for Reg – pkjensen on November 9th, 2007-
Re: Questions for Reg – messybear on November 9th, 2007
Re: Questions for Reg – edlorah on November 9th, 2007-
Re: Questions for Reg – Baerwald on November 10th, 2007-
Re: Questions for Reg – PatBrown on November 10th, 2007-
Re: Questions for Reg – Herring405 on November 10th, 2007
Re: Questions for Reg – Baerwald on November 10th, 2007-
An apology – Reg on November 11th, 2007-
Re: An apology – mick on November 11th, 2007
Re: An apology – Baerwald on November 11th, 2007-
Re: An apology – stark raving brad on November 12th, 2007-
Re: An apology – Baerwald on November 12th, 2007-
Re: An apology – stark raving brad on November 12th, 2007
Re: An apology – Reg on November 12th, 2007-
Re: An apology – Baerwald on November 12th, 2007
Nice post Reg – PatBrown on November 14th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – Reg on November 14th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – mick on November 14th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – Reg on November 14th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – mick on November 16th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – Reg on November 16th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – mick on November 16th, 2007-
Mick at the Old Spot – Dan on November 17th, 2007
Re: Nice post Reg – stark raving brad on November 17th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – mick on November 18th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – stark raving brad on November 18th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – mick on November 19th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – stark raving brad on November 19th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Reg – mick on November 19th, 2007-
Re: Nice post Mick – stark raving brad on November 20th, 2007
Re: Questions for Reg – PatBrown on November 14th, 2007
Re: Questions for Reg – PatBrown on November 10th, 2007-
It's not about winning political points, Pat... – Reg on November 10th, 2007
May I just point out – Green Mtn on November 10th, 2007
Re: Pat your WWII corollary is as weak as a cheerleader's virtue on prom night – pkjensen on November 10th, 2007
Re: Questions for Reg (Now you're talkin) – D/VM on November 15th, 2007-
Re: Questions for Reg (Now you're talkin) – stark raving brad on November 21st, 2007-
Re: Questions for Reg (Now you're talkin) – mick on November 22nd, 2007
Ok Reg so I listened a bit – PatBrown on November 10th, 2007-
He never said Israel should be wiped off the map, Pat... – Reg on November 10th, 2007-
Re: He never said Israel should be wiped off the map, Pat... – stark raving brad on November 11th, 2007
Re: Pat Brown right all along about the MSM...Selling us a war... – Eugene on November 11th, 2007
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
