I know you've heard some variation of this argument making the rounds, but I have yet to here a reasonable counterpoint. If in fact our fearless leaders are speaking the truth about WOMD and the world threat posed by Hussein, why are we not attacking, or planning to attack, N. Korea, China, Pakistan, etc. (all have nukes and other WOMD and sell them to who ever will pay for them) or Syria, Libya, Egypt, Lebanon, etc., all have longstanding, proven ties to terrorist organizations. It seems to me, many of these countries pose greater threats to us and the world, then Iraq.

Our government leaks info on almost any subject, usually to help further its agenda, it defies logic that almost no evidence re: WOMD, or credible threat, has been leaked or put forth by our governement, or other countries involved with the U.N. and U.N. inspections. If there is credible evidence of an imminent threat wouldn't those countries geographically closer to Iraq be clamoring for U.S. help, that's the usual modus operandi, i.e. repelling the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, we led and the world gladly followed.