Re: Proof?
Dan
location: WV➔VA➔FL➔WV➔OH
listening to: so many intros
registered: 1997.08.29
You see, Dale, that is where the problem is. I'm not on the ground in Iraq at the moment and I have to rely on what I read in the news and elsewhere (sorry Kent, that's the way it is with me). As far as I can tell from these sources (and your sources may vary) - the weapons program of which our President George spoke of in his SotU and elswhere has NOT been found. The weapons inspectors are leaving empty handed. Nothing. Now - can I give you proof that the WOMD didn't exist - no. But can I tell you that George's nuclear anthrax boogyman hasn't shown up yet - you bet! Dale, if he'd come out all along and said - "Hey, I want to put our armed forces in harm's way to topple Saddam" - and then played his hand like that - I would've had no problem with it. But to spin the so-called facts into a justification for war - that is unacceptable.
Dan
–--
throw out the hardware, let's do it right
Dan
(view)
You see, Dale, that is where the problem is. I'm not on the ground in Iraq at the moment and I have to rely on what I read in the news and elsewhere (sorry Kent, that's the way it is with me). As far as I can tell from these sources (and your sources may vary) - the weapons program of which our President George spoke of in his SotU and elswhere has NOT been found. The weapons inspectors are leaving empty handed. Nothing. Now - can I give you proof that the WOMD didn't exist - no. But can I tell you that George's nuclear anthrax boogyman hasn't shown up yet - you bet! Dale, if he'd come out all along and said - "Hey, I want to put our armed forces in harm's way to topple Saddam" - and then played his hand like that - I would've had no problem with it. But to spin the so-called facts into a justification for war - that is unacceptable.
Dan
–--
throw out the hardware, let's do it right
[
login] |
[
register]
you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts