Who produced the fake Niger papers? There is
nothing approaching a consensus on this
question within the intelligence community.
There has been published speculation about
the intelligence services of several different
countries. One theory, favored by some
journalists in Rome, is that sismi produced the
false documents and passed them to
Panorama for publication.Another explanation was provided by a former
senior C.I.A. officer. He had begun talking to me
about the Niger papers in March, when I first
wrote about the forgery, and said, “Somebody
deliberately let something false get in there.” He
became more forthcoming in subsequent
months, eventually saying that a small group of
disgruntled retired C.I.A. clandestine operators
had banded together in the late summer of last
year and drafted the fraudulent documents
themselves.“The agency guys were so pissed at Cheney,”
the former officer said. “They said, ‘O.K, we’re
going to put the bite on these guys.’” My source
said that he was first told of the fabrication late
last year, at one of the many holiday gatherings
in the Washington area of past and present
C.I.A. officials. “Everyone was bragging about
it—‘Here’s what we did. It was cool, cool, cool.’”
These retirees, he said, had superb contacts
among current officers in the agency and were
informed in detail of the sismi intelligence. “They thought that, with this crowd, it was the
only way to go—to nail these guys who were not
practicing good tradecraft and vetting
intelligence,” my source said. “They thought it’d
be bought at lower levels—a big bluff.” The
thinking, he said, was that the documents would
be endorsed by Iraq hawks at the top of the
Bush Administration, who would be unable to
resist flaunting them at a press conference or
an interagency government meeting. They
would then look foolish when intelligence
officials pointed out that they were obvious
fakes. But the tactic backfired, he said, when the
papers won widespread acceptance within the
Administration. “It got out of control.”Like all large institutions, C.I.A. headquarters, in
Langley, Virginia, is full of water-cooler gossip,
and a retired clandestine officer told me this
summer that the story about a former
operations officer faking the documents is
making the rounds. “What’s telling,” he added,
“is that the story, whether it’s true or not, is
believed”—an extraordinary commentary on the
level of mistrust, bitterness, and demoralization
within the C.I.A. under the Bush Administration.
(William Harlow, the C.I.A. spokesman, said that
the agency had no more evidence that former
members of the C.I.A. had forged the
documents “than we have that they were forged
by Mr. Hersh.”)The F.B.I. has been investigating the forgery at
the request of the Senate Intelligence
Committee. A senior F.B.I. official told me that
the possibility that the documents were falsified
by someone inside the American intelligence
community had not been ruled out. “This story
could go several directions,” he said. “We
haven’t gotten anything solid, and we’ve looked.”
He said that the F.B.I. agents assigned to the
case are putting a great deal of effort into the
investigation. But “somebody’s hiding
something, and they’re hiding it pretty well.”
B
Baerwald
(view)
Who produced the fake Niger papers? There is
nothing approaching a consensus on this
question within the intelligence community.
There has been published speculation about
the intelligence services of several different
countries. One theory, favored by some
journalists in Rome, is that sismi produced the
false documents and passed them to
Panorama for publication.Another explanation was provided by a former
senior C.I.A. officer. He had begun talking to me
about the Niger papers in March, when I first
wrote about the forgery, and said, “Somebody
deliberately let something false get in there.” He
became more forthcoming in subsequent
months, eventually saying that a small group of
disgruntled retired C.I.A. clandestine operators
had banded together in the late summer of last
year and drafted the fraudulent documents
themselves.“The agency guys were so pissed at Cheney,”
the former officer said. “They said, ‘O.K, we’re
going to put the bite on these guys.’” My source
said that he was first told of the fabrication late
last year, at one of the many holiday gatherings
in the Washington area of past and present
C.I.A. officials. “Everyone was bragging about
it—‘Here’s what we did. It was cool, cool, cool.’”
These retirees, he said, had superb contacts
among current officers in the agency and were
informed in detail of the sismi intelligence. “They thought that, with this crowd, it was the
only way to go—to nail these guys who were not
practicing good tradecraft and vetting
intelligence,” my source said. “They thought it’d
be bought at lower levels—a big bluff.” The
thinking, he said, was that the documents would
be endorsed by Iraq hawks at the top of the
Bush Administration, who would be unable to
resist flaunting them at a press conference or
an interagency government meeting. They
would then look foolish when intelligence
officials pointed out that they were obvious
fakes. But the tactic backfired, he said, when the
papers won widespread acceptance within the
Administration. “It got out of control.”Like all large institutions, C.I.A. headquarters, in
Langley, Virginia, is full of water-cooler gossip,
and a retired clandestine officer told me this
summer that the story about a former
operations officer faking the documents is
making the rounds. “What’s telling,” he added,
“is that the story, whether it’s true or not, is
believed”—an extraordinary commentary on the
level of mistrust, bitterness, and demoralization
within the C.I.A. under the Bush Administration.
(William Harlow, the C.I.A. spokesman, said that
the agency had no more evidence that former
members of the C.I.A. had forged the
documents “than we have that they were forged
by Mr. Hersh.”)The F.B.I. has been investigating the forgery at
the request of the Senate Intelligence
Committee. A senior F.B.I. official told me that
the possibility that the documents were falsified
by someone inside the American intelligence
community had not been ruled out. “This story
could go several directions,” he said. “We
haven’t gotten anything solid, and we’ve looked.”
He said that the F.B.I. agents assigned to the
case are putting a great deal of effort into the
investigation. But “somebody’s hiding
something, and they’re hiding it pretty well.”
