Eugene
location: Maryland
listening to: Alexander Scriabin-The Solo Piano Works, Maria Lettberg
registered: 1999.08.12
posts: 3540
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
To me, the most painless way is to raise the cap on withholding
That's what I said. Instead of the FICA going away at 102K it continues to the end of the year,
for
everybody. That is a much more fair solution. It also might generate more funds for SS by virtue of
the sheer numbers of wage earners contributing. But, I don't agree with you that it will be painless.
Take somebody earning say 150K (not exactly a Kings' ransom); they would pay 3,000
dollars extra tax without the "hole" in the donut.
What Obama proposes does ease the burden, for most, especially middle class, but goes after the
rich to subsidize, which I don't like in principle. His proposal is very politically crafty, because it
would certainly help fund the plan, but does so in a way which would please the majority of the
population. For people earning under 102K, nothing changes, the ones with slightly more income
get an enormous break (as they do now), but the smaller percentage of 'wealthier" people get
penalized; their numbers are not large enough to hurt him in an election, so he can feel comfortable
with revealing his proposal more clearly and at least I admire his honesty in stating the figure limit
he has in mind, instead of a surprise later, come tax time.
I fully support privatization and think it should be an option for those who chose to manage
their
own investments. Those who cannot manage their own portfolios, or who don't want to, can stay
with the current plan. It should be at least an option. I don't agree with you there.
E
Eugene
(view)
To me, the most painless way is to raise the cap on withholding
That's what I said. Instead of the FICA going away at 102K it continues to the end of the year,
for
everybody. That is a much more fair solution. It also might generate more funds for SS by virtue of
the sheer numbers of wage earners contributing. But, I don't agree with you that it will be painless.
Take somebody earning say 150K (not exactly a Kings' ransom); they would pay 3,000
dollars extra tax without the "hole" in the donut.
What Obama proposes does ease the burden, for most, especially middle class, but goes after the
rich to subsidize, which I don't like in principle. His proposal is very politically crafty, because it
would certainly help fund the plan, but does so in a way which would please the majority of the
population. For people earning under 102K, nothing changes, the ones with slightly more income
get an enormous break (as they do now), but the smaller percentage of 'wealthier" people get
penalized; their numbers are not large enough to hurt him in an election, so he can feel comfortable
with revealing his proposal more clearly and at least I admire his honesty in stating the figure limit
he has in mind, instead of a surprise later, come tax time.
I fully support privatization and think it should be an option for those who chose to manage
their
own investments. Those who cannot manage their own portfolios, or who don't want to, can stay
with the current plan. It should be at least an option. I don't agree with you there.
