| "Ironic how a such a slam could occur on a thread devoted to the band that defines insipid, "Boston" (and hey, I went to college there, and I love the city, but have no use for the band)." Peter T: I hope the question is received in the spirit it is meant when I ask why you find the music of Boston to be the definition of "insipid," meaning without taste. What are the specific qualities of that music that make you feel that either its creators or those who enjoy listening to it are tasteless? (Have you tasted a Boston fan lately? That's a joke.) I like their early stuff, and much of the later stuff, but for me it's mainly a memory trip. I had older siblings who played those early albums some, and I grew to like that stuff when I was young. Likewise with quite a few other bands who saw their stock rise in the 70's, like Yes, The Who, Gentle Giant, Rush, Pink Floyd, Kansas, Queen, Alan Parsons Project, ELO, etc. I enjoyed (and still enjoy) the complexity, the headphone-consciousness, the marriage of intricate sound to intricate lyrics . . . (Not to say that any one of those bands didn't have a stinker here & there, but the I like the general cut of their gib.) "I urge you to go to Youtube and check out "Clampdown", "Safe European Home", or "Police and Thieves". " I have tried on occasion to get into these guys (The Clash), but I fear I'll never own the taste that would make me want to return to their songs to fulfill the uses I have for music, or what I need from it. I would love to know what it is that you find attractive (or "sipid") about these songs, or others in the band's catalog. What, exactly, makes 'em "tasty" to you? Again, I ask in the spirit of inquiry, not competitiveness. "The influence of The Clash continues to grow, and further comments from me would be redundant. LISTEN TO THE MUSIC! " At your urging, I've once again tried listening to these guys & once again come away thinking "nah." One more question for you: where do you see The Clash's influence growing? And would you mind making a few of those "further comments"? I don't mind redundancy. Herring405 |
H
Herring405
(view)
| "Ironic how a such a slam could occur on a thread devoted to the band that defines insipid, "Boston" (and hey, I went to college there, and I love the city, but have no use for the band)." Peter T: I hope the question is received in the spirit it is meant when I ask why you find the music of Boston to be the definition of "insipid," meaning without taste. What are the specific qualities of that music that make you feel that either its creators or those who enjoy listening to it are tasteless? (Have you tasted a Boston fan lately? That's a joke.) I like their early stuff, and much of the later stuff, but for me it's mainly a memory trip. I had older siblings who played those early albums some, and I grew to like that stuff when I was young. Likewise with quite a few other bands who saw their stock rise in the 70's, like Yes, The Who, Gentle Giant, Rush, Pink Floyd, Kansas, Queen, Alan Parsons Project, ELO, etc. I enjoyed (and still enjoy) the complexity, the headphone-consciousness, the marriage of intricate sound to intricate lyrics . . . (Not to say that any one of those bands didn't have a stinker here & there, but the I like the general cut of their gib.) "I urge you to go to Youtube and check out "Clampdown", "Safe European Home", or "Police and Thieves". " I have tried on occasion to get into these guys (The Clash), but I fear I'll never own the taste that would make me want to return to their songs to fulfill the uses I have for music, or what I need from it. I would love to know what it is that you find attractive (or "sipid") about these songs, or others in the band's catalog. What, exactly, makes 'em "tasty" to you? Again, I ask in the spirit of inquiry, not competitiveness. "The influence of The Clash continues to grow, and further comments from me would be redundant. LISTEN TO THE MUSIC! " At your urging, I've once again tried listening to these guys & once again come away thinking "nah." One more question for you: where do you see The Clash's influence growing? And would you mind making a few of those "further comments"? I don't mind redundancy. Herring405 |
posted 2008.05.07
posted on May 7th 2008
-
BOSTON – Dan on May 4th, 2008-
Re: BOSTON – I.C.B. on May 4th, 2008-
Re: BOSTON – Kervo on May 4th, 2008-
Re: BOSTON – mick on May 4th, 2008-
Re: BOSTON – cyanaura on May 5th, 2008-
Re: BOSTON – rosskolnikov on May 5th, 2008-
Re: BOSTON – Herring405 on May 5th, 2008-
Re: BOSTON – rosskolnikov on May 5th, 2008
The Clash...Uninteresting?? – Peter T. on May 6th, 2008-
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – cyanaura on May 6th, 2008
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – rosskolnikov on May 6th, 2008
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – edlorah on May 6th, 2008-
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – Herring405 on May 6th, 2008
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – Herring405 on May 7th, 2008-
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – edlorah on May 7th, 2008-
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – edlorah on May 7th, 2008
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – pkjensen on May 7th, 2008-
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – edlorah on May 7th, 2008
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – stark raving brad on May 9th, 2008
Re: The Clash...Uninteresting?? – Herring405 on May 7th, 2008
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
