Icon Re: Now PK...
P
pkjensen (view)

Since you're probably a regular on the above websites, allow me to reply to you in a manner in which you're probably more familiar;

I don't read any of those sites on any type of frequent basis because too often there are no citations to back anything up.  I merely offered them up as examples, as they are reasonably equivalent to the links you offered.

I can be more precise(but I think I already was):  The first link with all of the quotes of the presidency-seeking Democrats was primarily from the point in time of late 02 and early 03 when all we heard was WMD from all points right.  It crept into the daily vocabulary and those we trusted to lead us down the right path drank the KoolAid.  I will note vote for, or support, any of them.  Each of them was trying to stake out their own territory on the WMD landscape.  One of the big reasons that Nancy P. doesn't want to go after impeachment hearings is that she'll have to testify that she agreed with them.  Bunch of dumbasses, all of them.

You're a fucking idiot. You asked for quotes, I gave you quotes. Verifyable quotes. And what do you do? You disregard them and mock the websites they on. Typical.

No more or less typical than anyone on the right mocking information that comes from a left-leaning website. You had an article from a Conservative rag and a compendium of quotes that would take hours to actually verify, since many of the links have moved.

Again, show me a quote from anyone other than BushCo that said they saw with their own eyes indisputable evidence that Saddam had an active WMD program post-1998.

BTW, I'm not backing down from my argument, throwing up my hands, and saying I'm quitting just because you called me a fucking idiot.  I'm used to that typical response from the right when they can't come up with objective, provable facts.

[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts