"Now this to me seems just useless because it makes no difference if the source presenting the information is Mr. Kay, Mr. Pelletiere, or Mr. Rove...if the info is damaging to a "belief" it's dismissed. How can that be?"

I have never dismissed anything. I have my own opinions and I keep most of them close to the vest. What I point out is hypocrisy (which is more than evident on ALL sides when having a debate). If David Kay had come out and said that there was strong evidence of WMD's in Iraq there would be no end to the character assassination he would receive from the left, but when he opposes the administration he is suddenly an unimpeachable source of God's truth. The same with Paul O'neill. When he was working for Bush, he was the root of all EVIL in the world. As soon as he writes a book bashing Bush he is suddenly a "principled statesman" who is shining the light of truth.

Do not make the mistake of taking my criticism of these people to mean some kind of loyalty to the Bush Administration. Just because I say John Kerry is a weenie does not mean that I dont think G. Bush is one as well. In fact, Lucianne.com banned people from putting links to our site when I posted an article written by me there because it was very critical of Bush.

As I said before. I have seen nothing that convinces me that things would be any different if a Dem were in office. If I vote for Bush I dont have to pay for new White House curtains.