Re: Among the Gender-Benders

Kevin

registered: 2002.08.18

posts: 1346
[view all posts]

: Setting aside the faces behind the Fla debacle, you're content with the US Supreme Court imposing their rule over the State's Supreme Court because _you_ think the rules were being bent in Fla. �Based on your Federalism argument, the stoner-geek-jocks in Fla (in this case, the Fla Supreme Court) should be allowed - no, expected - to do as they see fit in their dorm/state.

Poor Al...if only he'd won his home state of Tennessee, he wouldn't have needed Florida's votes to win the election. Get a clue.

K

Kevin (view)

: Setting aside the faces behind the Fla debacle, you're content with the US Supreme Court imposing their rule over the State's Supreme Court because _you_ think the rules were being bent in Fla. �Based on your Federalism argument, the stoner-geek-jocks in Fla (in this case, the Fla Supreme Court) should be allowed - no, expected - to do as they see fit in their dorm/state.

Poor Al...if only he'd won his home state of Tennessee, he wouldn't have needed Florida's votes to win the election. Get a clue.

[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts

Your Thoughts? – Baerwald on December 11th, 2001