: >>I can understand why someone of your beliefs >>might be sensitive to the accusation
: Not particularly. I probably feel the same as yourself when I bandy round all-purpose blanket statements that I think I can justify, but once those statements are examined they're either empty or half the truth.
Aah! Now we're getting somewhere. A fellow gets angry, a fellow says (and thinks) some nasty things. I disagree with virtually every thought that you've ever expressed on this page, but still. You have the right to say it. And I'm interested I guess, in your logic, much the way I'm drawn to fires, or car accidents and the like. I know that you represent a large number of people who think like you. I've listened to AM talk radio, too, just to different effect.
: >>But in this instance I wasn't drawing that >>parallel. Actually, I was referring more to the >>similarity between Rove's understanding of the >>nature of propaganda and Goebbel's. Rove's >>statements bespeak an endless contempt; >>for "the masses"
: For me it's no more worrying than the way Clinton and Gore seemed to like to use the Lenninistic philosophy of 'Vanguardism' which belives that the workers (or the masses) aren't able to act in their own interests and need an elite to lead them in revolution. (The race and class warfare of the election is a good example of that...also the WW2-sized taxes pretty much underline the point) It's safe to say that the picture is pretty much the same as it was during Clinton's heyday, except the band is different.
Clinton, Shminton. Demmicans and Republocrats. I personally faintly favor the Dems, as I prefer a gentle handjob con over a straight smash and grab, but that's just me. Aint no real biggie. Though I saw a funny headline
Bush: At Last, An End to Our Long National Nightmare of Peace and Prosperity
: � �
: >>I was sort of happy to see that your tail had >>lost none of its bushiness, but I'm remembering >>now what an abusive, thoughtless chatterbox you >>can be, and wonder why you choose to bombard >>this particular page with your parroted >>inanities. �
: I suppose that makes two of us... I'm deeply, deeply sorry that I dare to try and give as good as I get. There was me thinking that only good, patriotic Republicans are allowed to rush to judgement on people.
Touche.
Yrs,
db
B
Baerwald
(view)
: >>I can understand why someone of your beliefs >>might be sensitive to the accusation
: Not particularly. I probably feel the same as yourself when I bandy round all-purpose blanket statements that I think I can justify, but once those statements are examined they're either empty or half the truth.
Aah! Now we're getting somewhere. A fellow gets angry, a fellow says (and thinks) some nasty things. I disagree with virtually every thought that you've ever expressed on this page, but still. You have the right to say it. And I'm interested I guess, in your logic, much the way I'm drawn to fires, or car accidents and the like. I know that you represent a large number of people who think like you. I've listened to AM talk radio, too, just to different effect.
: >>But in this instance I wasn't drawing that >>parallel. Actually, I was referring more to the >>similarity between Rove's understanding of the >>nature of propaganda and Goebbel's. Rove's >>statements bespeak an endless contempt; >>for "the masses"
: For me it's no more worrying than the way Clinton and Gore seemed to like to use the Lenninistic philosophy of 'Vanguardism' which belives that the workers (or the masses) aren't able to act in their own interests and need an elite to lead them in revolution. (The race and class warfare of the election is a good example of that...also the WW2-sized taxes pretty much underline the point) It's safe to say that the picture is pretty much the same as it was during Clinton's heyday, except the band is different.
Clinton, Shminton. Demmicans and Republocrats. I personally faintly favor the Dems, as I prefer a gentle handjob con over a straight smash and grab, but that's just me. Aint no real biggie. Though I saw a funny headline
Bush: At Last, An End to Our Long National Nightmare of Peace and Prosperity
: � �
: >>I was sort of happy to see that your tail had >>lost none of its bushiness, but I'm remembering >>now what an abusive, thoughtless chatterbox you >>can be, and wonder why you choose to bombard >>this particular page with your parroted >>inanities. �
: I suppose that makes two of us... I'm deeply, deeply sorry that I dare to try and give as good as I get. There was me thinking that only good, patriotic Republicans are allowed to rush to judgement on people.
Touche.
Yrs,
db
: Not particularly. I probably feel the same as yourself when I bandy round all-purpose blanket statements that I think I can justify, but once those statements are examined they're either empty or half the truth.
Aah! Now we're getting somewhere. A fellow gets angry, a fellow says (and thinks) some nasty things. I disagree with virtually every thought that you've ever expressed on this page, but still. You have the right to say it. And I'm interested I guess, in your logic, much the way I'm drawn to fires, or car accidents and the like. I know that you represent a large number of people who think like you. I've listened to AM talk radio, too, just to different effect.
: >>But in this instance I wasn't drawing that >>parallel. Actually, I was referring more to the >>similarity between Rove's understanding of the >>nature of propaganda and Goebbel's. Rove's >>statements bespeak an endless contempt; >>for "the masses"
: For me it's no more worrying than the way Clinton and Gore seemed to like to use the Lenninistic philosophy of 'Vanguardism' which belives that the workers (or the masses) aren't able to act in their own interests and need an elite to lead them in revolution. (The race and class warfare of the election is a good example of that...also the WW2-sized taxes pretty much underline the point) It's safe to say that the picture is pretty much the same as it was during Clinton's heyday, except the band is different.
Clinton, Shminton. Demmicans and Republocrats. I personally faintly favor the Dems, as I prefer a gentle handjob con over a straight smash and grab, but that's just me. Aint no real biggie. Though I saw a funny headline
Bush: At Last, An End to Our Long National Nightmare of Peace and Prosperity
: � �
: >>I was sort of happy to see that your tail had >>lost none of its bushiness, but I'm remembering >>now what an abusive, thoughtless chatterbox you >>can be, and wonder why you choose to bombard >>this particular page with your parroted >>inanities. �
: I suppose that makes two of us... I'm deeply, deeply sorry that I dare to try and give as good as I get. There was me thinking that only good, patriotic Republicans are allowed to rush to judgement on people.
Touche.
Yrs,
db
posted 2001.12.18
posted on December 18th 2001
-
Your Thoughts? – Baerwald on December 11th, 2001-
Re: Your Thoughts? – eugene on December 17th, 2001
Re: Your Thoughts? – rms on December 13th, 2001-
Advice For A Dictator by Joseph Goebbels – Baerwald on December 14th, 2001-
Nazis vs. Conservatives – rms on December 16th, 2001-
Proper Ganders – Baerwald on December 16th, 2001-
Re: Proper Ganders – rms on December 17th, 2001-
Re: Proper Ganders – Baerwald on December 18th, 2001-
Re: Proper Ganders – rms on December 23rd, 2001-
Re: Proper Ganders – Andrea on December 23rd, 2001
Re: Proper Ganders – Kevin on December 16th, 2001
Springtime for Slanderers – rms on December 16th, 2001
Re: Advice For A Dictator by Joseph Goebbels – rms on December 14th, 2001
More Goebbels – Baerwald on December 20th, 2001-
Re: More Goebbels – mick on December 14th, 2001-
Yes, Virginia – Baerwald on December 15th, 2001
My thoughts in brief – Peter T. on December 13th, 2001-
Among the Gender-Benders – rms on December 16th, 2001-
Re: Among the Gender-Benders – Dan on December 17th, 2001-
Re: Among the Gender-Benders – rms on December 17th, 2001-
Florida – Andrea on December 19th, 2001-
Re: Florida – rms on January 2nd, 2002-
Re: Florida – Andrea on January 3rd, 2002
Re: Among the Gender-Benders – Dan on December 17th, 2001-
Re: Among the Gender-Benders – Kevin on December 17th, 2001-
Re: Among the Gender-Benders – Dan on December 17th, 2001-
Re: Among the Gender-Benders – rms on January 2nd, 2002-
Re: Among the Gender-Benders – Dan on January 2nd, 2002-
Re: Among the Gender-Benders – rms on January 14th, 2002
Re: Among the Gender-Benders – Kevin on December 17th, 2001
Re: My thoughts in brief – rms on December 14th, 2001
Re: Your Thoughts? – mick on December 13th, 2001-
Re: Your Thoughts? – rms on December 13th, 2001-
Your Thoughts are not your thoughts – mick on December 13th, 2001-
Re: Your Thoughts are not your thoughts – rms on December 13th, 2001-
Re: Your Thoughts are not your thoughts – mick on December 14th, 2001-
Re: Your Thoughts are not your thoughts – kravitz on December 16th, 2001-
Re: Your Thoughts are not your thoughts – rms on December 16th, 2001
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
