Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
All the information, facts not my opinions on the media treatment of the
situation or behaviors of certain people, have been reported. Most of the
information is quite old. I've seen all of it in print. My comments on the
media handling it are based on what they say on television which, from what
I have seen, has been focused on just mystery and questions because that
draws people in.
To be fair to the media on this though, I mean as fair as I can be
here, it
is pretty tough to get people to go on record about something like this and
so nobody is going to "claim" Epstein as their spy. Just won't happen so
basically it is "responsible journalism" for them to tiptoe around it.
Doesn't mean we can't discuss it and doesn't take away how obvious it
is in
terms of who he primarily worked for.
Take into consideration here the Epstein story is pretty old. So, media
people have known about it for a long time. They just stayed away from it
for years. This is front and center now because some newspaper reporters in
Florida would not let it go.
Nothing I said is not known, just left out of most discussion of it.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
Reg
(view)
All the information, facts not my opinions on the media treatment of the
situation or behaviors of certain people, have been reported. Most of the
information is quite old. I've seen all of it in print. My comments on the
media handling it are based on what they say on television which, from what
I have seen, has been focused on just mystery and questions because that
draws people in.
To be fair to the media on this though, I mean as fair as I can be
here, it
is pretty tough to get people to go on record about something like this and
so nobody is going to "claim" Epstein as their spy. Just won't happen so
basically it is "responsible journalism" for them to tiptoe around it.
Doesn't mean we can't discuss it and doesn't take away how obvious it
is in
terms of who he primarily worked for.
Take into consideration here the Epstein story is pretty old. So, media
people have known about it for a long time. They just stayed away from it
for years. This is front and center now because some newspaper reporters in
Florida would not let it go.
Nothing I said is not known, just left out of most discussion of it.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
