Icon Re: Depmnt. of Collections; Pre-adolescents Division
Avatar
Reg (view)

All the information, facts not my opinions on the media treatment of the situation or behaviors of certain people, have been reported. Most of the information is quite old. I've seen all of it in print. My comments on the media handling it are based on what they say on television which, from what I have seen, has been focused on just mystery and questions because that draws people in.

To be fair to the media on this though, I mean as fair as I can be here, it is pretty tough to get people to go on record about something like this and so nobody is going to "claim" Epstein as their spy. Just won't happen so basically it is "responsible journalism" for them to tiptoe around it.

Doesn't mean we can't discuss it and doesn't take away how obvious it is in terms of who he primarily worked for.

Take into consideration here the Epstein story is pretty old. So, media people have known about it for a long time. They just stayed away from it for years. This is front and center now because some newspaper reporters in Florida would not let it go.

Nothing I said is not known, just left out of most discussion of it.

–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts