Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
I've been fairly hesitant to post here about this but wondered what
people here thought about it or if in fact they thought about it at
all...because truth is, this is a very unpleasant thing to have running
around in your skull. The primary thing to be wary of in this case is there are way more
questions than answers and that is probably not an accident. There are however some facts we can look at that point to/reveal certain
things.The other aspect of this that comes into play though is, who wants to get
into this when the more "common sense" folks are looking at issues that
impact their day to day existence. Would this have been perfect fodder for Kent? You bet, this well is deep
and wide and scattered with names and events that would have both allowed
and encouraged the sort of dot connecting that Kent was so deeply
enamored of.How do I look at this? Well, the Epstein case is no joke. It is not a
phony story, there are a boatload of facts that show what he was doing
and who he was doing it with. This is not the idiotic Pizzagate we are
looking at here. Here's a minor suggestion on my part...step back a bit from the names
Clinton and Trump. These will only serve to confuse people and create the
image that this is some sort of partisan nonsense we can just dismiss. I think there are some people that would prefer we rapidly write this off
as just Epstein was a scumbag who diddled children and leave it at that.
Good riddance to bad garbage.Problem is, that's not what the facts say. Epstein was a guy that set it
up so lots of people could diddle children and he could "collect" these
people on video and photos and take testimony from the people they were
diddling about what they liked and did not like. He did not do this along
any "partisan" lines. This was not just about one sicko satisfying his love for sex with
children. This was a major operation. It went on for decades. It involved
a lot of people. I mean you can see this however you would like but if Epstein was just a
pervert that wanted to enjoy years of banging little girls why did he
involve so many people in his fun and spend so much time making sure he
had evidence of them doing so? He would have had a much better time and been much less likely to get
caught had he not done this. Instead, he took some major risks...in order
to "collect people."In fact you are going to be hard pressed to find wealthy and powerful
names from the last several decades that Epstein did not try to get close
to. Keep in mind this does not mean everybody he met or tried to meet or
tried to get close to had sex with children. It appears to have been
Epstein's job to meet as many of the wealthy and powerful as he could. Not all of them were as stupid as Donald Trump who invited Epstein over
for a private party at Mar-a-Lago before it was open to the public with
some 30 women/girls hand picked by Epstein so Donny and Jeff could have
the women all to themselves. Must have been a great night. Just one night
in their 15 year buddy buddy "let's get laid" relationship. Oddly, this
could work in Trump's favor...sick as that is...and I can explain why. Here's the thing, there are facts and these are hard to get around. I
won't go through the entire shit ton of them but let's just look at a
couple. Start with the name Robert Maxwell. Robert Maxwell was a Mossad asset
that worked for the Israelis providing them with all sorts of fun stuff. Why is this name significant? Well, Robert Maxwell was the daddy of
Ghislaine Maxwell, right hand woman of one Jeff Epstein. Gee, how odd is
that?I mean, her daddy collected people, helped the Israelis procure naughty
software, and she ends up hooked up with this Epstein guy helping him do
the same thing once daddy has died. Epstein was also connected to Ehud Barak. Oops. The former general,
Defense Minister, and Prime Minister of Israel. Hilariously, current
Prime Minister and confirmed lowlife Netanyahu, who knows all about
Epstein, has attempted to use Barak's "relationship" with Epstein against
him. This is so goddamned funny because Bibi knows that Epstein was an Israeli
intelligence asset and so he knows exactly why Barak has met with him on
so many occasions. And this is where this whole thing turns fun...you know, when your kind
of fun is setting up and running an intelligence operation that involves
recruiting young girls for sex with powerful and wealthy men. This can all be used and spun in different ways. Trump and his minions
have been all about looking for ways to undermine our law enforcement and
intelligence agencies. What could be more fun than exposing some sort of
sick intelligence operation that actually utilized the recruitment and
rape of children?And what better time to do this than a moment in time when about 1/3 of
the voting public will believe absolutely anything Trump says?I would have to think that with an operation as big as Epstein's was it
could not have escaped being on the radar of our own intelligence
services. David could add a line to one of his songs "And Jeffrey Epstein is dead."
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
Reg
(view)
I've been fairly hesitant to post here about this but wondered what
people here thought about it or if in fact they thought about it at
all...because truth is, this is a very unpleasant thing to have running
around in your skull. The primary thing to be wary of in this case is there are way more
questions than answers and that is probably not an accident. There are however some facts we can look at that point to/reveal certain
things.The other aspect of this that comes into play though is, who wants to get
into this when the more "common sense" folks are looking at issues that
impact their day to day existence. Would this have been perfect fodder for Kent? You bet, this well is deep
and wide and scattered with names and events that would have both allowed
and encouraged the sort of dot connecting that Kent was so deeply
enamored of.How do I look at this? Well, the Epstein case is no joke. It is not a
phony story, there are a boatload of facts that show what he was doing
and who he was doing it with. This is not the idiotic Pizzagate we are
looking at here. Here's a minor suggestion on my part...step back a bit from the names
Clinton and Trump. These will only serve to confuse people and create the
image that this is some sort of partisan nonsense we can just dismiss. I think there are some people that would prefer we rapidly write this off
as just Epstein was a scumbag who diddled children and leave it at that.
Good riddance to bad garbage.Problem is, that's not what the facts say. Epstein was a guy that set it
up so lots of people could diddle children and he could "collect" these
people on video and photos and take testimony from the people they were
diddling about what they liked and did not like. He did not do this along
any "partisan" lines. This was not just about one sicko satisfying his love for sex with
children. This was a major operation. It went on for decades. It involved
a lot of people. I mean you can see this however you would like but if Epstein was just a
pervert that wanted to enjoy years of banging little girls why did he
involve so many people in his fun and spend so much time making sure he
had evidence of them doing so? He would have had a much better time and been much less likely to get
caught had he not done this. Instead, he took some major risks...in order
to "collect people."In fact you are going to be hard pressed to find wealthy and powerful
names from the last several decades that Epstein did not try to get close
to. Keep in mind this does not mean everybody he met or tried to meet or
tried to get close to had sex with children. It appears to have been
Epstein's job to meet as many of the wealthy and powerful as he could. Not all of them were as stupid as Donald Trump who invited Epstein over
for a private party at Mar-a-Lago before it was open to the public with
some 30 women/girls hand picked by Epstein so Donny and Jeff could have
the women all to themselves. Must have been a great night. Just one night
in their 15 year buddy buddy "let's get laid" relationship. Oddly, this
could work in Trump's favor...sick as that is...and I can explain why. Here's the thing, there are facts and these are hard to get around. I
won't go through the entire shit ton of them but let's just look at a
couple. Start with the name Robert Maxwell. Robert Maxwell was a Mossad asset
that worked for the Israelis providing them with all sorts of fun stuff. Why is this name significant? Well, Robert Maxwell was the daddy of
Ghislaine Maxwell, right hand woman of one Jeff Epstein. Gee, how odd is
that?I mean, her daddy collected people, helped the Israelis procure naughty
software, and she ends up hooked up with this Epstein guy helping him do
the same thing once daddy has died. Epstein was also connected to Ehud Barak. Oops. The former general,
Defense Minister, and Prime Minister of Israel. Hilariously, current
Prime Minister and confirmed lowlife Netanyahu, who knows all about
Epstein, has attempted to use Barak's "relationship" with Epstein against
him. This is so goddamned funny because Bibi knows that Epstein was an Israeli
intelligence asset and so he knows exactly why Barak has met with him on
so many occasions. And this is where this whole thing turns fun...you know, when your kind
of fun is setting up and running an intelligence operation that involves
recruiting young girls for sex with powerful and wealthy men. This can all be used and spun in different ways. Trump and his minions
have been all about looking for ways to undermine our law enforcement and
intelligence agencies. What could be more fun than exposing some sort of
sick intelligence operation that actually utilized the recruitment and
rape of children?And what better time to do this than a moment in time when about 1/3 of
the voting public will believe absolutely anything Trump says?I would have to think that with an operation as big as Epstein's was it
could not have escaped being on the radar of our own intelligence
services. David could add a line to one of his songs "And Jeffrey Epstein is dead."
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
