heathcliffe
location: woods
listening to: silence
registered: 2008.11.18
posts: 956
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
And the beat goes on. Andrew Schmookler in his Parable of the Tribes, 1984,
describes the dynamic of power civilization introduced. Your sense of its horror in today's edition of it was reported by Thucydides in his day's edition of it.Imagine a group of tribes living within reach of one another. If all choose the way of peace, then all may live in peace. But what if all but one choose peace, and that one is ambitious for expansion and conquest? What can happen to the others when confronted by an ambitious and potent neighbor? Perhaps one tribe is attacked and defeated, its people destroyed and its lands seized for the use of the victors. Another is defeated, but this one is not exterminated; rather, it is subjugated and transformed to serve the conqueror. A third seeking to avoid such disaster flees from the area into some inaccessible (and undesirable) place, and its former homeland becomes part of the growing empire of the power-seeking tribe. Let us suppose that others observing these developments decide to defend themselves in order to preserve themselves and their autonomy. But the irony is that successful defense against a power-maximizing aggressor requires a society to become more like the society that threatens it. Power can be stopped only by power, and if the threatening society has discovered ways to magnify its power through innovations in organization or technology (or whatever), the defensive society will have to transform itself into something more like its foe in order to resist the external force.
H
heathcliffe
(view)
And the beat goes on. Andrew Schmookler in his Parable of the Tribes, 1984,
describes the dynamic of power civilization introduced. Your sense of its horror in today's edition of it was reported by Thucydides in his day's edition of it.Imagine a group of tribes living within reach of one another. If all choose the way of peace, then all may live in peace. But what if all but one choose peace, and that one is ambitious for expansion and conquest? What can happen to the others when confronted by an ambitious and potent neighbor? Perhaps one tribe is attacked and defeated, its people destroyed and its lands seized for the use of the victors. Another is defeated, but this one is not exterminated; rather, it is subjugated and transformed to serve the conqueror. A third seeking to avoid such disaster flees from the area into some inaccessible (and undesirable) place, and its former homeland becomes part of the growing empire of the power-seeking tribe. Let us suppose that others observing these developments decide to defend themselves in order to preserve themselves and their autonomy. But the irony is that successful defense against a power-maximizing aggressor requires a society to become more like the society that threatens it. Power can be stopped only by power, and if the threatening society has discovered ways to magnify its power through innovations in organization or technology (or whatever), the defensive society will have to transform itself into something more like its foe in order to resist the external force.
posted 2014.08.23
posted on August 23rd 2014
H
heathcliffe
location: woods
listening to: silence
registered: 2008.11.18
posts: 956
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
The black dog... – Reg on August 12th, 2014-
Churchill's Black Dog – Peter T. on August 12th, 2014
So a few words to go with the above videos... – Reg on August 13th, 2014-
Re: So a few words to go with the above videos... – Dslacker on August 13th, 2014-
Re: So a few words to go with the above videos... – Reg on August 17th, 2014-
Re: So a few words to go with the above videos... – Dslacker on August 18th, 2014
Re: So a few words to go with the above videos... – Chucker on August 14th, 2014
-
-
-
