Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation

PatBrown

registered: 2002.04.26

posts: 3218
[view all posts]

Well done Brian. That makes sense

PatBrown (view)

Well done Brian. That makes sense

[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts

Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – KentDB741 on September 11th, 2002
- Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – Dale on September 11th, 2002
  - Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – KentDB741 on September 12th, 2002
    
    write write write – Kravitz on September 12th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – Dale on September 12th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – [email protected] on September 12th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – [email protected] on September 12th, 2002
    
    Seismographs dual use: disable reason – Kravitz on September 12th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismographs dual use: disable reason – [email protected] on September 12th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – Dale on September 12th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – Kervo on September 12th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – KentDB741 on September 13th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – Brian on September 12th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – PatBrown on September 12th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – KentDB741 on September 13th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – Dan on September 13th, 2002
    
    Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation – Andrea on September 15th, 2002
    
    Re: Document W199-eye information – KentDB741 on September 15th, 2002