Icon Re: Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation
K
KentDB741 (view)

Dale said:

> I can't believe ANYONE would have the audacity  to post this article at all; let alone on 9/11.
> I'd really like to hear your reasons for posting this trash.

Dale:

First of all, I may have missed something very important, and perhaps you could fill me in as to when the TRUTH became lowered to the level of TRASH?!? It must have been around the same time that the United States Court of Appeals considered the words "under GOD" unconstitutional, even though our United States Constitution refers directly to OUR CREATOR, and the unalienable rights bestowed upon us, as in these following words:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by THEIR CREATOR with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness . . ."

Also, your pejorative use of the phrase "conspiracy theories" completely misses the point that what I posted IS FACT, and is NOT A THEORY AT ALL!!!

On September 20, 2001, the BBC reported that several seismographic monitoring stations on the east coast had recorded the 9/11 controlled demolition of the WTC towers, and these charts show beyond any reasonable doubt that the towers fell as a result of a controlled implosion of the structures, and not because of the nonsensical "official story" put forth by our government.

Also, Building 7, which was NOT hit by any plane at all, fell in precisely the same symmetrical fashion, many hours later, after 4:00pm that afternoon.

What is your answer to that one?!?!?

Additionally, the nationally distributed firefighter magazine, FIRE ENGINEERING, in its' January 2002 issue, unequivocably stated "there was NO WAY that those towers fell because of planes flying into them, or any of the other "official reasons" put forth by the government."

Also, in the September 21, 2001 issue of PEOPLE magazine, firefighter Louie Cacchioli, 51, who was trapped inside the building for awhile, stated that there were multiple bombs going off all around him. You see, a firefighter would know the difference between a bomb, and an explosion of another kind entirely.

And if that isn't enough TRUTH for you Dale, several architectural engineers have gone on public record stating that there is NO WAY that airplane impact did that damage, and specifically, to have created a seismographic imprint that is IDENTICAL to a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION of a building.

Another damming fact is that the same company that was in charge of the Murrah building CONTROLLED DEMOLITION in Oklahoma in 1995, was also in charge of the WTC site. The name of that company is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, INC., and they were the ones that brought the buildings down, and NOT airplane impact.

Furthermore, as each of the two towers were impacted on one side only by one airplane each, there has been DEAD SILENCE on the fact that both buildings fell in identical PRECISE SYMMETRICAL MANNER, because there is only one thing that can fairly explain that--- and that is a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION IMPLOSION of the buildings, and NOT this nonsense that the plane fuel went down the elevator shafts.

The 9/11 event was the most recorded event in history, and many different cameras caught both impacts, which show the VAST MAJORITY of the plane fuel exploding OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDINGS, where it could not possibly travelled down an elevator shaft, unless that elevator shaft was suspended in mid-air outside of the building!

So Dale, you call the TRUTH, as recorded by multiple witnesses and scientists and building engineers TRASH. Are you %#@% kidding me?!?!?

Go look at the video footage of 9/11, and one cannot help but notice that what happened IS NOT what they are forcing you to believe.

The other day, a spokesperson for the FEDERAL AVAITION AGENCY (FAA) made the following statement:

"Every single aviation disaster in this country has been investigated intensely by the FAA. All except one--- 9/11. We cannot investigate that, because they destroyed all of the evidence."

Destruction of evidence is tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice, and a bunch of similar charges. And, I suppose that they destroyed all of the BILLION TONS of evidence, because they wanted the TRUTH to come out?!?!?

Also, the fact that BU$H and Bin Laden are business partners means nothing to you, correct? Or the fact that in document W199-eye, BU$H absolutely forbid any arrests of anyone associated with Al-Qeda prior to 9/11 also means nothing, correct? I suppose that even though I have a copy of the W199-eye document, that it is still only my own paranoid "theory," correct?

My sources are sound, and using the usual "oh well, that is just a paranoid conspiracy theory," only does the bidding of the puppet masters that seek to control me (and NEVER will), but you, they have firmly in their grasp.

Also, if you think that it is audacious to TELL THE TRUTH in this day and age, then you need some serious help, to say the least.

Remember this:

When absolute, documentable, and verifiable, proof is presented--- the conspiracy THEORY becomes absolute PROOF that a conspiracy exists!

So Dale, you are DEAD-ASS wrong, there are no two ways about it. Your punishment is that you must write out the following on the blackboard a thousand times:

"When proof is presented, theory becomes TRUTH!"

Now, go get writing . . .

 

 

[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts