Re: 32000 leading scientists?
Wow, Pat, that one I think sets a new bar if for nothing other than sheer incomprehensibilty. Look at
your sentences, man! It reads like something typed into a crude translator bot and fed out unedited.
B
Baerwald
(view)
Wow, Pat, that one I think sets a new bar if for nothing other than sheer incomprehensibilty. Look at
your sentences, man! It reads like something typed into a crude translator bot and fed out unedited.
-
32000 leading scientists? – Herring405 on January 11th, 2010
