Kevin G, that is such a ticky tack argument.  Sure, the UN inspectors might not have been sent in to quote unquote find WOMD, but don't you think if the US and the UK had such irrefutable proof of their existance, they should have shared it with the inspectors.  Wouldn't it have made their case much clearer - and truthful if the inspectors could have walked into one of the biological weapons facilities that Geoge assured the nation (and the world) were being updated to churn out WOMD as we speak.  Or if the nuclear facilities that were only 45 minutes away from doomsday could have been uncovered by the weapons inspectors?  Now I don't carry any water for Saddam - but when there's nothing there Kevin G., there's nothing to find.  And that's precisely what's happening - nothing is being found.  And the worst part - aside from the needless killing and carnage our military brought upon Iraq - is the fact that the right is blowing the whole pre-war argument off.  WOMD...fahgettaboutit.  We weren't really that worried about that stuff anyway.  Maybe I'm alone in thinking that something as big as a pre-emptive strike against (and subsequent occupation of) a country should be based on more than plagerized falsehoods.

Ok Kevin G, straight up - do you think that if Tariq Aziz would have come to the UN and said "we have no WOMD - and here's a list of stuff we destroyed" Bush and his goons would have backed out of war?

Dan