stark raving brad
location: over here. no, over HERE. HERE!!! sigh. you dummy.
listening to: experience, strength, and hope
registered: 2002.05.16
posts: 1638
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
trust your senses, then. i've read Harris and Dawkins. due to the dark place i was in two years ago, i enjoyed their work at
the time. now? poor buggers.and i agree that religion and 'God' are way too intertwined. i don't particularly care for the word
myself; it's been rendered nearly useless by prejudices and misconceptions.------------------------------------------------------------------------Campbell, from pages 56-57:Campbell: It's a matter of planes of consciousness. There is the planes of consciousness where you
can identify yourself with that which transcends pairs of opposites.Moyers: Which is?Campbell: Unnameable. Unnameable. it is transcendent of all names.Moyers: God?Campbell: "God" is an ambiguous word in our language because it appears to refer to something
that is known. But the transcendent is unknowable and unknown. God is transcendent, finally, of
anything like the name "God." God is beyond names and forms. Meister Eckhart said that the
ultimate and highest leave-taking is leaving God for God, leaving your notions of God for an
experience of that which transcends all notions.
The mystery of life is beyond all human conception. Everything we know is within the terminology
of the concepts of being and not being, many and single, true and untrue. We always think in terms
of pairs of opposites. But God, the ultimate, is beyond the pairs of opposites, that is all there is to
it.Moyers: Why do we think in terms of opposites?Campbell: Because we can't think otherwise.Moyers: That's the nature of reality in our time.Campbell: That's the nature of our experience of reality.--------------------------------------------------------------more, from pages 73-74:Campbell: Poetry is a metaphorical language.Moyers: A metaphor suggests potential.Campbell: Yes, but it also suggests the actuality that hides behind the visible aspect. The metaphor
is the mask of God through which eternity is to be experienced.Moyers: You speak of the poets and artists. What about the clergy?Campbell: I think our clergy is really not doing its proper work. It does not speak about the
connotations of the metaphors but is stuck with the ethics of good and evil.Moyers: What haven't the priests become the shamans of American society?Campbell: The difference between a priest and a shaman is that the priest is a functionary and the
shaman is someone who has had an experience. In our tradition it is the monk who seeks the
experience, while the priest is the one who has studied to serve the community.
I had a friend who attended an international meeting of the Roman Catholic meditative orders,
which was held in Bangkok. He told me that the Catholic monks had no problems understanding
the Buddhist monks, but that it was the clergy of the two religions who were unable to understand
each other.
The person who has had a mystical experience knows that all the symbolic expressions of it are
faulty. The symbols don't render the experience, they suggest it. If you haven't had the experience,
how can you know what it is? Try to explain the joy of skiing to somebody living in the tropics who
has never even seen snow. There has to be an experience to catch the message, some clue -
otherwise you're not hearing what is being said.Moyers: The person who has the experience has to project it the best way he can with images. It
seems to me that we have lost the art in our society of thinking in images.Campbell: Oh, we definitely have. Our thinking is largely discursive, verbal, linear. There is more
reality in an image than in a word.Moyers: Do you ever think that it is this absence of of the religious experience of ecstasy, joy, this
denial of transcendence in our society, that has turned so many young people to the use of drugs?Campbell: Absolutely. That is the way in.Moyers: The way in?Campbell: To an experience.Moyers: And religion can't do that for you, or art can't do it?Campbell: It could, but it's not doing it now. Religions are addressing social problems and ethics
instead of the mystical experience.
S
stark raving brad
(view)
trust your senses, then. i've read Harris and Dawkins. due to the dark place i was in two years ago, i enjoyed their work at
the time. now? poor buggers.and i agree that religion and 'God' are way too intertwined. i don't particularly care for the word
myself; it's been rendered nearly useless by prejudices and misconceptions.------------------------------------------------------------------------Campbell, from pages 56-57:Campbell: It's a matter of planes of consciousness. There is the planes of consciousness where you
can identify yourself with that which transcends pairs of opposites.Moyers: Which is?Campbell: Unnameable. Unnameable. it is transcendent of all names.Moyers: God?Campbell: "God" is an ambiguous word in our language because it appears to refer to something
that is known. But the transcendent is unknowable and unknown. God is transcendent, finally, of
anything like the name "God." God is beyond names and forms. Meister Eckhart said that the
ultimate and highest leave-taking is leaving God for God, leaving your notions of God for an
experience of that which transcends all notions.
The mystery of life is beyond all human conception. Everything we know is within the terminology
of the concepts of being and not being, many and single, true and untrue. We always think in terms
of pairs of opposites. But God, the ultimate, is beyond the pairs of opposites, that is all there is to
it.Moyers: Why do we think in terms of opposites?Campbell: Because we can't think otherwise.Moyers: That's the nature of reality in our time.Campbell: That's the nature of our experience of reality.--------------------------------------------------------------more, from pages 73-74:Campbell: Poetry is a metaphorical language.Moyers: A metaphor suggests potential.Campbell: Yes, but it also suggests the actuality that hides behind the visible aspect. The metaphor
is the mask of God through which eternity is to be experienced.Moyers: You speak of the poets and artists. What about the clergy?Campbell: I think our clergy is really not doing its proper work. It does not speak about the
connotations of the metaphors but is stuck with the ethics of good and evil.Moyers: What haven't the priests become the shamans of American society?Campbell: The difference between a priest and a shaman is that the priest is a functionary and the
shaman is someone who has had an experience. In our tradition it is the monk who seeks the
experience, while the priest is the one who has studied to serve the community.
I had a friend who attended an international meeting of the Roman Catholic meditative orders,
which was held in Bangkok. He told me that the Catholic monks had no problems understanding
the Buddhist monks, but that it was the clergy of the two religions who were unable to understand
each other.
The person who has had a mystical experience knows that all the symbolic expressions of it are
faulty. The symbols don't render the experience, they suggest it. If you haven't had the experience,
how can you know what it is? Try to explain the joy of skiing to somebody living in the tropics who
has never even seen snow. There has to be an experience to catch the message, some clue -
otherwise you're not hearing what is being said.Moyers: The person who has the experience has to project it the best way he can with images. It
seems to me that we have lost the art in our society of thinking in images.Campbell: Oh, we definitely have. Our thinking is largely discursive, verbal, linear. There is more
reality in an image than in a word.Moyers: Do you ever think that it is this absence of of the religious experience of ecstasy, joy, this
denial of transcendence in our society, that has turned so many young people to the use of drugs?Campbell: Absolutely. That is the way in.Moyers: The way in?Campbell: To an experience.Moyers: And religion can't do that for you, or art can't do it?Campbell: It could, but it's not doing it now. Religions are addressing social problems and ethics
instead of the mystical experience.
posted 2008.06.30
posted on June 30th 2008
S
stark raving brad
location: over here. no, over HERE. HERE!!! sigh. you dummy.
listening to: experience, strength, and hope
registered: 2002.05.16
posts: 1638
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
If We Attack Iran ( A Worst Case Scenario) – Peter T. on June 28th, 2008-
Re: If We Attack Iran ( A Worst Case Scenario) – blockdog on June 28th, 2008-
Re: If We Attack Iran ( A Worst Case Scenario) – Baerwald on June 28th, 2008-
Christian Jihadists ..... – PatBrown on June 28th, 2008-
Re: Christian Jihadists ..... – Baerwald on June 28th, 2008-
Re: Christian Jihadists .....religion and power - modern theocracy.... – Lee on June 29th, 2008-
Re: Christian Jihadists .....religion and power - modern theocracy.... – PatBrown on June 29th, 2008
Re: Christian Jihadists .....religion and power - modern theocracy.... – Herring405 on June 29th, 2008
Gee, Lee, Pat is a Moonie... – Reg on June 29th, 2008-
Re: Gee, Lee, Pat is a Moonie... – Lee on June 30th, 2008-
Re: Gee, Lee, Pat is a Moonie... – Reg on June 30th, 2008
Re: Gee, Lee, Pat is a Moonie... – rosskolnikov on June 30th, 2008
Let me ask you David – PatBrown on June 29th, 2008-
Re: Let me ask you David – stark raving brad on June 29th, 2008-
"The One", SRB? – Peter T. on June 29th, 2008-
OMG – stark raving brad on June 29th, 2008-
OMG – Peter T. on June 29th, 2008-
Re: OMG – stark raving brad on June 30th, 2008
I don't believe in Sam Harris – edlorah on June 30th, 2008-
Re: I don't believe in Sam Harris – rosskolnikov on June 30th, 2008-
Great thread! – Reg on June 30th, 2008-
Re: Great thread! – edlorah on June 30th, 2008-
Re: Great thread! – Reg on June 30th, 2008-
Re: Great thread! – stark raving brad on June 30th, 2008
Re: I don't believe in Sam Harris – edlorah on July 1st, 2008-
Re: I don't believe in Sam Harris – rosskolnikov on July 1st, 2008
The One, SRB – blockdog on June 30th, 2008
The One, SRB ( Yo Messy ) – blockdog on June 30th, 2008
Re: Let me ask you David – Herring405 on June 29th, 2008
Re: Let me ask you (David) – rosskolnikov on June 30th, 2008-
Re: Let me ask you (David) – edlorah on June 30th, 2008
Remember Rossi – PatBrown on July 1st, 2008-
Re: Remember Rossi – Herring405 on July 1st, 2008-
Re: Remember Rossi – PatBrown on July 1st, 2008-
Re: Remember Rossi – Herring405 on July 1st, 2008-
Re: Remember Rossi – PatBrown on July 1st, 2008-
Re: Remember Rossi – Herring405 on July 1st, 2008
Re: Remember Rossi – stark raving brad on July 1st, 2008
All Hat, No Cattle – edlorah on July 1st, 2008
Re: Remember . . . – rosskolnikov on July 1st, 2008
Re: Christian Jihadists ..... – nks422 on July 1st, 2008
Re: If We Attack Iran ( A Worst Case Scenario) – Reg on June 28th, 2008-
Re: If We Attack Iran ( A Worst Case Scenario) – mick on June 29th, 2008
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
