Wow, are you clutching at straws or what?To the first--probably the leaker is a pissed off lifer at either
Justice, NSA or CIA--one of hundreds and probably thousands that
are now officially fed up with the lies, incompetence, and criminal
acts that exemplify this administration. You'd be amazed at how
many of these guys are floating around. And what kind of records
some of them keep. And some of them even know reporters! But this is pure three card monte that you and the white house are
playing--the real issue is that Bush clearly has been engaged in
exactly the kind of thing that forced Nixon's resignation--the
illegal use of our national security apparatus, spying on American
citizens, and bypassing the judicial branch. All highly impeachable
offenses, to add to the growing list of impeachable offenses this
administration is guilty of. And this one has the additional feature
of having a recent, and undeniable precedent in Nixon. Both used
elements of the national security apparatus to spy on Americans,
and political opponents, for their own purposes. Nixon was forced
to resign. Bush?And the canard that these rights were granted Bush by Congress?
Au contraire. Congress specifically denied the request in 2003. To the second--Powell supports some level of "eavesdropping", as
long as they have due cause and a warrant.
He wonders why they didnt just get warrants. A little bird tells me
that the reason for that is to minimize the paper trail, as the off-
the-record and illegal wiretaps were primarily against, not Al
Qaeda, or anyone vaguely affiliated with terrorism, but instead
against political opponents of Bush and the neocons. Like, say,
John Kerry.And wow, stop the presses! So US intelligence agencies use
wiretaps! Oh no, what will Al Qaeda do with that shocking
information? What a dastardly thing to do, to let that secret
knowledge get out! And we use computers???!! How can we let
such information into the public marketplace?!!! Clearly a
treasonous leak! Easily on a par with burning a twenty-five year
cover of an anti-WMD unit of the CIA for purely selfish political
reasons. After all, everybody knew that Valerie Plame wasnt really
an energy analyst, and that Brewster Jennings was a front company.
And who needs the four to six hundred people that got burned
there? It's only nuclear arms control. To the third, well, to me, neither are terribly inspiring, and Rice'll
be lucky to avoid indictment. But are you telling us that you want
Condi Rice as President?
B
Baerwald
(view)
Wow, are you clutching at straws or what?To the first--probably the leaker is a pissed off lifer at either
Justice, NSA or CIA--one of hundreds and probably thousands that
are now officially fed up with the lies, incompetence, and criminal
acts that exemplify this administration. You'd be amazed at how
many of these guys are floating around. And what kind of records
some of them keep. And some of them even know reporters! But this is pure three card monte that you and the white house are
playing--the real issue is that Bush clearly has been engaged in
exactly the kind of thing that forced Nixon's resignation--the
illegal use of our national security apparatus, spying on American
citizens, and bypassing the judicial branch. All highly impeachable
offenses, to add to the growing list of impeachable offenses this
administration is guilty of. And this one has the additional feature
of having a recent, and undeniable precedent in Nixon. Both used
elements of the national security apparatus to spy on Americans,
and political opponents, for their own purposes. Nixon was forced
to resign. Bush?And the canard that these rights were granted Bush by Congress?
Au contraire. Congress specifically denied the request in 2003. To the second--Powell supports some level of "eavesdropping", as
long as they have due cause and a warrant.
He wonders why they didnt just get warrants. A little bird tells me
that the reason for that is to minimize the paper trail, as the off-
the-record and illegal wiretaps were primarily against, not Al
Qaeda, or anyone vaguely affiliated with terrorism, but instead
against political opponents of Bush and the neocons. Like, say,
John Kerry.And wow, stop the presses! So US intelligence agencies use
wiretaps! Oh no, what will Al Qaeda do with that shocking
information? What a dastardly thing to do, to let that secret
knowledge get out! And we use computers???!! How can we let
such information into the public marketplace?!!! Clearly a
treasonous leak! Easily on a par with burning a twenty-five year
cover of an anti-WMD unit of the CIA for purely selfish political
reasons. After all, everybody knew that Valerie Plame wasnt really
an energy analyst, and that Brewster Jennings was a front company.
And who needs the four to six hundred people that got burned
there? It's only nuclear arms control. To the third, well, to me, neither are terribly inspiring, and Rice'll
be lucky to avoid indictment. But are you telling us that you want
Condi Rice as President?
