Icon Re: Childless
G
Green Mtn (view)

Hi Kevin:

I wasn't talking about loving couples. Nor was Bill Maher. Nor was Gregg. Though I didn't see the show, I'm sure there was, as in Gregg's post, a strong undercurrent of 'hehehe, wish it was like that when I was in HS'. And you know that(I suspect)!

For your sake let's change to a more noble(seemingly:) creature. Although dog is apt when boys are trying/hoping to get laid, cause 'most' anything will do. Perhaps this didn't apply to you or your circle in HS but when I was a young buck most of the fellows I knew were rutting by the time they were in junior high. It was an ever present topic of conversation. The wild oats syndrome is a biological urge, which has little to do with love at that age, or ever as best I can tell. Every guy in that audience who was tittering, I guarantee, was thinking pretty much the same as Gregg wrote and Maher undoubtedly suggested coyly. They only quit trying because of consequences: marriage, getting busted, fear of disease, divorced, or masturbation better fit their budget/personality. Peal back the facade and we're not pretty creatures.

So, can we agree, that we are speaking of sex. Just sex. Horny rutting boys, with girls who have been convinced by the authorities and social presures in their realm that oral sex isn't really sex, and who have figured out that getting buggered is better than getting pregnant; which has lead to the increase in oral SEXUALLY Transmitted Disease's in the past decade. Is that good for our children/society, in your opinion? So what, you don't have children, how about a neice, a little sister? Is that what you would want/hope for them?

Look I gathered a long time ago that you are homosexual. I don't care. I look forward to your monthly music reviews. So don't try to turn this into something other than what I responded to: taking this sexual trend among this nations youth lightly. I'm not intimated by PC speech, though I too know what I'm not 'spose to say, even when I do anyway.

And hey, if you have a loving homosexual relationship, you're doing better than most of the queers or breeders, that I've ever known. Cause at the bottom of most sexual politics between breeders(shouldn't I be offended-)it is a derogatory term on your part isn't it?), is security and sex not love. I mean comeon, most people seem to equate sex with love.

So if you like, let's go a few more rounds on the disgusting aspects of the humon condition. I'm not afraid, I promise you.o)

Your dear friend, Montag
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts