Icon Re: Here's all the context you need Eric
P
PatBrown (view)

However, the big issue is why did all of these polticians and the right side believe all of the intelligence saying Iraq had all of these weapons? And I'll tell you.....pick up a copy of the new Atlantic Jan/Feb issue and pick up an issue of the New Yorker about about month ago. There are three main groups of people in the Shrub Whitehouse that need to be fired - Cheney and his group; Rumsfeld and his group and Wolfowitz and his group.
Eric I knew when 9/11 happened that we were going into Iraq after we took care of Bin Laden. There was never any doubt in my mind about that


In the latest in depth news articles I have read, at its most simplest form, these people took all intelligence, cut out the CIA and other intelligence experts and then cherry picked the data they wanted regardless of its accuracy. This practice is covered in all of these articles and is shameful.
So we have a mole inside our intelligence giving specific information to the press?

 

The article in the new Atlantic mentions this. I suggest picking it up.
Point to a link and I'll be glad to read it

I'll say this about our military leadership, it is good the ones that had balls stood up against Rumsfeld because he originally only wanted 75,000 troops for Iraq! Can you imagine that Pat! 75,000.
And................

[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts