Y'all funny.

Especially the Americans who only want the 1st Amendment to apply to what their ears want to hear, lol.

As to your remarks Mick, he's a military man, he's spose to talk about war and killing and related matters. Let's keep in mind, no matter his personal beliefs, he's been sent to make war by this President and the Democratic Congress too. But if one y'all arranges it, I'll go talk with him in y'all's behalf. I don't expect he'd like me much as I don't favor these foreign policy initiatives.

Although I didn't see anything terribly objectionable in the Wiki piece except perhaps his breaking of some elements of the Uniform Code -& even then, from a scriptural point of view- he has a duty to obey God rather than the traditions of men. Which, not being conversant with his/this situation, I have no comment on.

As to his assertion that the God of Abraham is greater than Allah, about that there is no question. If you do your research you will discover that Allah was the 'moon god' in a pantheon of Arab tribal gods before Mohammed singled him out for greatness. If it is anyones assertion that he has no right to state his beliefs publicly; I would again refer you Americans to the first sentence, and the non Americans(where the 1st Amendment does not necessarily apply that -not unlike a Moslem- a Christians first duty is to the Almighty.

Which is why I posted that short read for Ed earlier in the week. If anyone was to read it, you would know that among Julian Huxley's goals in founding UNESCO was to stamp out Christianity and replace it with a pantheistic/animistic humanist oriented religion for the masses. Further, if one was to even give a cursory study of UNESCO's history you would have no difficulty recognizing that that organization has in no way veered from their founders mission.

My only problem with that is that the folks -even herein- who support these missions, lie about it. H.G. Wells was a tad bit peeved about that last century -this plans have been long in the making & execution- when he wrote about a New World Order or The Open Conspiracy, what with his being a Fabian Society member and all, he seemed to hold the minority view that these plans should be out in the open, and that people might actually embrace eugenics and the depopulation of the useless eaters, and then the useful idiots, lol..

I might also add -sorry Eugene, I've no quarrel with your faith- I am sorry to see Boykin messing with the Zionists. Until recent years, I did not understand that there is a difference between the Judaic faith and Zionist state of Israel. I made the common mistake that the faith and the state are in entire agreement, or one and the same even. Really rather foolish of me, but there you have it. And, it has changed my foreign policy views toward the state, if not the people.

And gentlemen, a number of raptures will transpire one day, and some of you will be in the forefront of dismissing it, as now. Too, Armageddon is still a future event -when I don't know- but Jesus, the King of Kings will settle who's in charge, in the middle east and the world over, once and for all, during and after his millennial reign from Jerusalem, as foretold. I do understand your distaste, since he, the Word of God that taketh away the sins of the world is not your cup of tea, but what can ya do.

That said, I do disagree with this idiotic notion of trying to bring prophecy/Armageddon about since no man knows the time, yknow.

QUICK, someone denounce that man ...

It's beautiful day, and I've taters dig! YIPPEE