KentDB741
location: Buffalo, New York USA
listening to: The sweet music of YES
registered: 2001.11.12
posts: 1355
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Roger:The reaction some people have concerning Charlie Kaufman is a
perfect example of how such people are no longer able to think in
any manner other than simple linear plot progression. Of the films you listed, I have seen four:01) Being John Malkovich02) Adaptation03) Confessions of a Dangerous Mind04) Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless MindWithout exception, all of the negative comments I have heard
about any of these films relate to their "non-linear" presentation. A
couple of other recent films that were done in this same manner,
were 21 Grams, Memento, and Vanilla Sky. Whether it was
comments made by people I know, or have spoken to about any or
all of these films --- certain people just cannot think in any other
manner than in a strict linear progression.I had a friend recently tell me that he thought Memento was
garbage, and when I asked him why, he told me that it was not
understandable. I found that very unfortunate, especially as I
personally found Memento to be one of the best films of the past
few years. What distressed my friend was the very thing I
liked most about it --- that it was different.The Matrix quintology was a perfect example of this; while the first
film is a legendary piece of filmmaking, parts two through five
were humdrum predictability. And, just so there is no
misunderstanding, these are the five parts of The Matrix
quintology:01) The Matrix (1999)02) The Matrix Reloaded (2003)03) The Animatrix (2003)04) Enter The Matrix (2003)05) The Matrix Revolutions (2003)The Matrix started out with one of the most innovative ideas, but
by the time we all got to Matrix Revolutions, this innovative idea
had turned into a high-tech battle, the likes of which we have seen
many times before, inside and outside of the sci-fi genre.Where the wild innovation of The Matrix gave way to just another
dull and boring formulaic ending, some of the very people who ate
that up, are the same people who have complained about Charlie
Kaufman not being understandable. Perhaps the reason for the
complaints is these films make the viewer THINK DIFFERENTLY, and
also to treat the movie experience in a different manner.Our entire mass media suffers because of this generalized and
sweeping lack of intelligence, as the same contrivances are forced
upon all viewers of TV and film. When one idea hits and becomes
successful, suddenly the multitude of living dead clones flood the
marketplace with variations on the same theme. Perhaps the most
firmly entrenched are television sitcoms, and this is likely the
reason why Entertainment Weekly asked in its' April 2, 2004 cover
story, "ARE SITCOMS DEAD?" As long as they keep shovelling the "will they or won't they?" story
line, it doesn't matter if the "they" is Sam and Diane (Cheers),
Rachel and Ross (Friends), or Ed and Carol (Ed), it is all the same
nonsense. This alone may be the reason why netwrok television
has lost 40% of its' audience in the past handful of years.Whether it is television or film, most often the more intelligent
something is, the smaller the audience it attracts. Even though in
1999, as many people watched Freaks and Geeks then, as watch 24
today, F & G got cancelled while 24 remains on the air.So, those who claim that films such as those written by Charlie
Kaufman are unable to be understood properly, there remains no
shortage of films such people can continue to enjoy. While I am out
there enjoying something intelligent, like the George Clooney film
Solaris, those who are dumbed down can flood the theatres for the
simplicity inherent in films like The Fast And The Furious, XXX, and
others of their ilk.However, this situation exists for a reason, and that reason is quite
simple. On pg. 48 of a report issued by the Bilderberg Group on
May 31, 1979, it clearly states in a section labeled DIVERSION
SUMMARY:ENTERTAINMENT: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth-
grade level.Moreover in that same section of the report, it clearly states:MEDIA: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real
social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance.SCHOOLS: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics,
real economics, real law, and real history.WORK: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think.I think that the above quoted sections from this Bilderberg Group
report should be immediately recognizable to most everyone, as
this accurately describes our current situation, as it relates to most
peoples' ability to think. KDB = Buffalo, NY USA
K
KentDB741
(view)
Roger:The reaction some people have concerning Charlie Kaufman is a
perfect example of how such people are no longer able to think in
any manner other than simple linear plot progression. Of the films you listed, I have seen four:01) Being John Malkovich02) Adaptation03) Confessions of a Dangerous Mind04) Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless MindWithout exception, all of the negative comments I have heard
about any of these films relate to their "non-linear" presentation. A
couple of other recent films that were done in this same manner,
were 21 Grams, Memento, and Vanilla Sky. Whether it was
comments made by people I know, or have spoken to about any or
all of these films --- certain people just cannot think in any other
manner than in a strict linear progression.I had a friend recently tell me that he thought Memento was
garbage, and when I asked him why, he told me that it was not
understandable. I found that very unfortunate, especially as I
personally found Memento to be one of the best films of the past
few years. What distressed my friend was the very thing I
liked most about it --- that it was different.The Matrix quintology was a perfect example of this; while the first
film is a legendary piece of filmmaking, parts two through five
were humdrum predictability. And, just so there is no
misunderstanding, these are the five parts of The Matrix
quintology:01) The Matrix (1999)02) The Matrix Reloaded (2003)03) The Animatrix (2003)04) Enter The Matrix (2003)05) The Matrix Revolutions (2003)The Matrix started out with one of the most innovative ideas, but
by the time we all got to Matrix Revolutions, this innovative idea
had turned into a high-tech battle, the likes of which we have seen
many times before, inside and outside of the sci-fi genre.Where the wild innovation of The Matrix gave way to just another
dull and boring formulaic ending, some of the very people who ate
that up, are the same people who have complained about Charlie
Kaufman not being understandable. Perhaps the reason for the
complaints is these films make the viewer THINK DIFFERENTLY, and
also to treat the movie experience in a different manner.Our entire mass media suffers because of this generalized and
sweeping lack of intelligence, as the same contrivances are forced
upon all viewers of TV and film. When one idea hits and becomes
successful, suddenly the multitude of living dead clones flood the
marketplace with variations on the same theme. Perhaps the most
firmly entrenched are television sitcoms, and this is likely the
reason why Entertainment Weekly asked in its' April 2, 2004 cover
story, "ARE SITCOMS DEAD?" As long as they keep shovelling the "will they or won't they?" story
line, it doesn't matter if the "they" is Sam and Diane (Cheers),
Rachel and Ross (Friends), or Ed and Carol (Ed), it is all the same
nonsense. This alone may be the reason why netwrok television
has lost 40% of its' audience in the past handful of years.Whether it is television or film, most often the more intelligent
something is, the smaller the audience it attracts. Even though in
1999, as many people watched Freaks and Geeks then, as watch 24
today, F & G got cancelled while 24 remains on the air.So, those who claim that films such as those written by Charlie
Kaufman are unable to be understood properly, there remains no
shortage of films such people can continue to enjoy. While I am out
there enjoying something intelligent, like the George Clooney film
Solaris, those who are dumbed down can flood the theatres for the
simplicity inherent in films like The Fast And The Furious, XXX, and
others of their ilk.However, this situation exists for a reason, and that reason is quite
simple. On pg. 48 of a report issued by the Bilderberg Group on
May 31, 1979, it clearly states in a section labeled DIVERSION
SUMMARY:ENTERTAINMENT: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth-
grade level.Moreover in that same section of the report, it clearly states:MEDIA: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real
social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance.SCHOOLS: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics,
real economics, real law, and real history.WORK: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think.I think that the above quoted sections from this Bilderberg Group
report should be immediately recognizable to most everyone, as
this accurately describes our current situation, as it relates to most
peoples' ability to think. KDB = Buffalo, NY USA
