Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Well, I thought the end of the film was pretty straight forward. The main character really had lost everything of value to him so clearly he had motive to want an end to his suffering. I did not think they were going to kill him but he faced the same fate as McMurphy in Cuckoo's Nest. Clearly the effort they made to bring him back was due to the fact that he had been a decent man driven to where he was by horrible circumstances. I don't know, maybe this will sound odd but I thought the movie was more than the story was...meaning while the story is pulp and on it's surface full of holes, that works for the film because it adds to the level of uncertainty and disorientation the audience is meant to feel. It helps suck you into the world of the main character because he is so obviously uncertain and disoriented from the get-go. I have not read or seen anything from Scorsese on if this was his intention, I just assume it was. I'll be honest, I had the film all sorted out in the opening minutes but I thought it was such a fun ride that did not bother me a bit.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
Reg
(view)
Well, I thought the end of the film was pretty straight forward. The main character really had lost everything of value to him so clearly he had motive to want an end to his suffering. I did not think they were going to kill him but he faced the same fate as McMurphy in Cuckoo's Nest. Clearly the effort they made to bring him back was due to the fact that he had been a decent man driven to where he was by horrible circumstances. I don't know, maybe this will sound odd but I thought the movie was more than the story was...meaning while the story is pulp and on it's surface full of holes, that works for the film because it adds to the level of uncertainty and disorientation the audience is meant to feel. It helps suck you into the world of the main character because he is so obviously uncertain and disoriented from the get-go. I have not read or seen anything from Scorsese on if this was his intention, I just assume it was. I'll be honest, I had the film all sorted out in the opening minutes but I thought it was such a fun ride that did not bother me a bit.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
posted 2010.03.26
posted on March 26th 2010
Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
The Ghost of Alfred Hitchcock – Reg on March 23rd, 2010-
Re: The Ghost of Alfred Hitchcock – pkjensen on March 23rd, 2010-
Re: The Ghost of Alfred Hitchcock – messybear on March 23rd, 2010
-
-
