Re: David: you're on Springsteen's iPod.
rosskolnikov
location: Far end of the Group W bench
listening to: The Tony Rice Unit
registered: 2005.05.24
posts: 1822
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
>Now that I'm so very in-sync with our dear friend Cyan-aura, I'll offer >that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"Now that I'm so very in-sync with our dear friend Cyan-aura, I'll offer >that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"Now that I'm so very in-sync with our dear friend Cyan-aura, I'll offer >that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"Except that's not what he/she said. The precise comment was "What a load of crap," which ordinarily is the type of comment not open to a wide range of interpretations . . .
–--
.:RS:.
.:RS:.
R
rosskolnikov
(view)
>Now that I'm so very in-sync with our dear friend Cyan-aura, I'll offer >that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"Now that I'm so very in-sync with our dear friend Cyan-aura, I'll offer >that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"Now that I'm so very in-sync with our dear friend Cyan-aura, I'll offer >that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"that I think the message had to do with the concept of putting up "what's >on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"on your iPod, Bruce?" as opposed to "are iPods any good or not?"Except that's not what he/she said. The precise comment was "What a load of crap," which ordinarily is the type of comment not open to a wide range of interpretations . . .
–--
.:RS:.
.:RS:.
-
David: you're on Springsteen's iPod. – The Waiter on February 28th, 2008-
Re: David: you're on Springsteen's iPod. – jeff_wells on February 29th, 2008
Re: David: you're on Springsteen's iPod. – cyanaura on February 29th, 2008-
Re: David: you're on Springsteen's iPod. – Herring405 on February 29th, 2008
-
Re: David: you're on Springsteen's iPod. – cyanaura on February 29th, 2008
-
Re: David: you're on Springsteen's iPod. – Herring405 on February 29th, 2008
Re: David: you're on Springsteen's iPod. – I.C.B. on February 29th, 2008
-
Re: David: you're on Springsteen's iPod. – Christopher on February 29th, 2008
Re: David: you're on Springsteen's iPod. – cyanaura on March 1st, 2008
-
-
-
