Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
To this point Dan, I have not seen written reports but I have heard
many parents talking about it on the radio.And you can be assured, I will post links as soon as I have them.
But I doubt you'll need me to do that. I suspect, from what I've
heard so far reports will be rampant, at least, hopefully so, if this is
as dangerous as the folks I've heard talking about it say it is.This thing is only about 6 months on the market isn't Dan? I'm
asking because I think that's what I heard.And ntl, the important part of the post is that despite the school
and media avowals to the contrary; if you have any concerns, you
need not give your daughter this, or any vaccine, just because the
school says so. You can opt-out! And personally, if it were me, I would opt-out my daughters. I'd
stand back and watch fer a few years and see how this plays out.
From what I've heard so far, if you're one of the unlucky ones, I'd
bet you would have rather told your daughter that the best and
safest means of preventing cervical cancer is to postpone sexual
intercourse until her body has fully matured, and that the risk
increases with the multiplication of sexual partners. Yeah, if yours
is one of the unlucky ones, like the dramatically increasing number
of autistic parents, I bet your child would have preferred your
caution. Too, there's no saying they can't receive the vaccine at 14,
or 18, or whenever they choose after that.Never forget! the money element in all of this. Never forget! the
rush, nor the deceptive means of promotion. There're reasons for
such pushing. You, nor I, may know what they are, but it's always
a sign to think it over, ah little more.Also, I forget her name, but I heard the Texas state rep who
sponsored 'a law' to implement this course of action, say she was
surprised by Gov Perry's action; especially considering, there was
no hope that the Texas legislature would pass it into law. Again,
given all the anti-Bush people here, have you investigated whether
Perry, like Bush, receives expansive pharma money. I hear he does.
Call the Texas connection.And be assured Dan, I will get back to you.respects
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
To this point Dan, I have not seen written reports but I have heard
many parents talking about it on the radio.And you can be assured, I will post links as soon as I have them.
But I doubt you'll need me to do that. I suspect, from what I've
heard so far reports will be rampant, at least, hopefully so, if this is
as dangerous as the folks I've heard talking about it say it is.This thing is only about 6 months on the market isn't Dan? I'm
asking because I think that's what I heard.And ntl, the important part of the post is that despite the school
and media avowals to the contrary; if you have any concerns, you
need not give your daughter this, or any vaccine, just because the
school says so. You can opt-out! And personally, if it were me, I would opt-out my daughters. I'd
stand back and watch fer a few years and see how this plays out.
From what I've heard so far, if you're one of the unlucky ones, I'd
bet you would have rather told your daughter that the best and
safest means of preventing cervical cancer is to postpone sexual
intercourse until her body has fully matured, and that the risk
increases with the multiplication of sexual partners. Yeah, if yours
is one of the unlucky ones, like the dramatically increasing number
of autistic parents, I bet your child would have preferred your
caution. Too, there's no saying they can't receive the vaccine at 14,
or 18, or whenever they choose after that.Never forget! the money element in all of this. Never forget! the
rush, nor the deceptive means of promotion. There're reasons for
such pushing. You, nor I, may know what they are, but it's always
a sign to think it over, ah little more.Also, I forget her name, but I heard the Texas state rep who
sponsored 'a law' to implement this course of action, say she was
surprised by Gov Perry's action; especially considering, there was
no hope that the Texas legislature would pass it into law. Again,
given all the anti-Bush people here, have you investigated whether
Perry, like Bush, receives expansive pharma money. I hear he does.
Call the Texas connection.And be assured Dan, I will get back to you.respects
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
