Re: Bonds has 618 now, actually
i'm in this camp: http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=hruby/060512
it's a rather lengthy but fairly scientific breakdown of what his totals would more accurately be w/out the juice. a colossal asshole, yep, but a colossal talent; a Hall of Famer either way.
and yet i'm also with Bonds on this: i'd trade 'em all for a WS ring. well, maybe next year...
and yeah, Krav, the Brewers may be around for a while. at least they're finally watchable.
i'm in this camp: http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=hruby/060512
it's a rather lengthy but fairly scientific breakdown of what his totals would more accurately be w/out the juice. a colossal asshole, yep, but a colossal talent; a Hall of Famer either way.
and yet i'm also with Bonds on this: i'd trade 'em all for a WS ring. well, maybe next year...
and yeah, Krav, the Brewers may be around for a while. at least they're finally watchable.
