Icon Here are a couple of questions
P
PatBrown (view)

But they are good at avoiding answers. For example, some time ago when Pat was repeating the talking points of O'Lielly about the Geneva Conventions only covering uniformed soldiers, I asked him what should we expect when Special Forces members are not wearing uniforms on covert operations, or for that matter, remember the young CIA agent killed during the time of the American Taliban? He and his colleagues were wearing civillian clothing.

Are  you talking a spy? One that is going in as a hired assassin going in on a covert mission? I would think if they were caught it would not be good. But we are not comparing apples here. We are talking about looney cowards that hide behind the shroud of the Koran and kill indescriminately. That is hardly a soldier and yet you want them recognized as one. I say no way.
Let me ask you something. Why is it we never here outcries about the Muslim random bombings. Eric can you imagine if Christians were doing the same thing would we have the ACLU making sure their rights were represented fairly? I say no and you would have a press that was perpetually condemning Christians for these acts. Why don't we get that for Muslims. They were doing these acts long before 911 so the argument that the U.S. is responsible in any way for the London bombings just plays into the hands of the terrorists. Should more contries be like Spain and cower down? There will be a day when Spain will pay a price for doing that. They will be attacked because they are weak and passive. I was hearing some of the liberal ideas coming out of London suggesting Peace meetings for the Islamic Middle East. What a laugher

posted 2005.07.10
[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts