You show your bias as proudly as our emperor does his nakedness.

Do you recall the idiot who wrote the book about GWB and his cocaine use a few years ago?  I think the title was "Fortunate Son."  Now, do you recall how he was roundly disputed as a quack and how little coverage he got? 

Now be sincere and honest and compare that to the history of O'Neill and Corsi and the coverage they have gotten.  (If you don't know enough about Corsi, go to http://www.mediamatters.org and it will show you some history of this quack's background)

In comparison, it puts the coverage of the Bush quack to shame and shows a true amount of bias in coverage. 

Now here is a real world comparison to what people might know about others and might not.  As I've said before, in my organization there are about 230 co-workers.  We have small units of varying sizes that work in a city the size of 115,000 or so.  I would say we work very close and in a close geographic area.  What I would not try to do is claim to know of all the acts others carry out in units I am not a part of. 

So in other words, ALL of the people on Kerry's Swiftboat stand behind him 100 percent - all but one that is, the last has passed on.  So now, we are asked by this disgruntled group to believe that people who have not even served with Kerry know better than those who were on a Swiftboat WITH Kerry.  That is ludicrous. 

Frankly, this is all about what Kerry did AFTER the war and not during and if you turned on CSPAN today you would have seen that this O'Niell has been chasing Kerry around for over thirty-years.  They replayed the Dick Cavett show with both of them on it.

Oh, one last piece of hypocrisy here - just who keeps trying to say that this election is not about someone's service thirty years ago?  The frigging republicans do.  So which is it?  Is Kerry allowed to use his Vietnam service or not?  

Face it, GWB is a coward who was too chicken to do the right thing thirty years ago and is still letting other people fight his battles for him.