EEE
location: Landscape Challenged Illinois
listening to: 16 Horsepower, black music from the 70's & and still going broke from Paste Magazine
registered: 2002.08.26
posts: 3227
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
First, if you want to defend Ahmed Chalabi, the person I called a "scumbag" that is fine, but you need to look more at his character. He is a scumbag and needs to be in an American prison. (This son of a bitch was on American tv a while back and the interviewer confronted him with intelligence he gave us that was learned to be bad that he promised to be good. He had the audacity to say that it wasn't his fault what the Americans did with the information he gave us. Then he claimed to have documents showing there was a link between Iraq and al Queda but would never provide them. Even Chalibi's former handler Richard Perle has since disowned him). Bush is a liar and the people around him who have pushed his lies are nothing less than chronies. And I shy away from neither.I have given citations of sources for information about the lies of Bush et al. I do not claim to "know it all" however, there are some things out there that have been proven false over and over again.As I said, go to the Atlantic magazine website and read two of the articles on the war in Iraq. Go rent the two documentaries on PBS in the last year about the war. In all of these, it is shown where the Bush Administration has purposely kept those who knew best out because of contrary opinions over and over again. Sure, pro-war people will say, "hey, all of these places are biased" but my response to those that do is, "fine, they may be biased, but what do you say about the fact that their reporting has turned out to be factual?"Finally, is it not a lie to push information that people tell you is wrong? The engineers at the International Atomic Energy Association told the Bush Administration the aluminum tubes were not suitable for nuclear weapons. So did American engineers. So, would it not be a lie to say, "hey, these tubes are made to make nuclear weapons." Bush did this.Or is it not a lie to fabricate information in such a way that it persuades people to think one way when it is known not to be true? (Hussein was behind 9/11). The lies go on and on. I'm not telling them, others are. So I suggest turn off FauxNews, Rush Limpball, O'Lielly and search for some sources that YOU can learn to trust and who have a proven track record for the truth and those who don't have a partisan agenda.
E
EEE
(view)
First, if you want to defend Ahmed Chalabi, the person I called a "scumbag" that is fine, but you need to look more at his character. He is a scumbag and needs to be in an American prison. (This son of a bitch was on American tv a while back and the interviewer confronted him with intelligence he gave us that was learned to be bad that he promised to be good. He had the audacity to say that it wasn't his fault what the Americans did with the information he gave us. Then he claimed to have documents showing there was a link between Iraq and al Queda but would never provide them. Even Chalibi's former handler Richard Perle has since disowned him). Bush is a liar and the people around him who have pushed his lies are nothing less than chronies. And I shy away from neither.I have given citations of sources for information about the lies of Bush et al. I do not claim to "know it all" however, there are some things out there that have been proven false over and over again.As I said, go to the Atlantic magazine website and read two of the articles on the war in Iraq. Go rent the two documentaries on PBS in the last year about the war. In all of these, it is shown where the Bush Administration has purposely kept those who knew best out because of contrary opinions over and over again. Sure, pro-war people will say, "hey, all of these places are biased" but my response to those that do is, "fine, they may be biased, but what do you say about the fact that their reporting has turned out to be factual?"Finally, is it not a lie to push information that people tell you is wrong? The engineers at the International Atomic Energy Association told the Bush Administration the aluminum tubes were not suitable for nuclear weapons. So did American engineers. So, would it not be a lie to say, "hey, these tubes are made to make nuclear weapons." Bush did this.Or is it not a lie to fabricate information in such a way that it persuades people to think one way when it is known not to be true? (Hussein was behind 9/11). The lies go on and on. I'm not telling them, others are. So I suggest turn off FauxNews, Rush Limpball, O'Lielly and search for some sources that YOU can learn to trust and who have a proven track record for the truth and those who don't have a partisan agenda.
posted 2004.07.29
posted on July 29th 2004
E
EEE
location: Landscape Challenged Illinois
listening to: 16 Horsepower, black music from the 70's & and still going broke from Paste Magazine
registered: 2002.08.26
posts: 3227
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
Michael Moore on O'Reilly tonight – RWR's Ghost on July 27th, 2004-
Re: Michael Moore on O'Reilly tonight – Dan on July 27th, 2004-
Re: Michael Moore on O'Reilly tonight – RWR's Ghost on July 27th, 2004-
Re: Michael Moore on O'Reilly tonight – edlorah on July 27th, 2004
Re: Michael Moore on O'Reilly tonight – edlorah on July 27th, 2004
Re: Michael Moore on O'Reilly tonight – Andrea on July 28th, 2004-
Re: Michael Moore on O'Reilly tonight – RWR's Ghost on July 28th, 2004-
Re: Michael Moore on O'Reilly tonight – Reg on July 28th, 2004-
Re: Michael Moore on O'Reilly tonight – RWR's Ghost on July 28th, 2004-
Cherry Picking..... – EEE on July 28th, 2004-
And don't forget Paul O'Neil – Peter T. on July 28th, 2004-
Re: And don't forget Paul O'Neil – RWR's Ghost on July 28th, 2004-
Plenty O' Presidential Prevarication – Peter T. on July 28th, 2004
Re: Cherry Picking..... – RWR's Ghost on July 28th, 2004-
Re: Cherry Picking..... – edlorah on July 28th, 2004
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
