What's to lose? It's an FYI. It's no secret I view the notion that global warming, though it may be occurring naturally, and there is some debate about that, if the truth be told, is a social engineering mechanism of magnificiently Machevellian proportions.

“...there was no point in seeking to convert the intellectuals. For intellectuals would never be converted and would anyway always yield to the stronger, `and this will always be the man in the street.' Arguments must therefore be crude, clear and forcible, and appeal to emotions and instincts, not the intellect. Truth was unimportant and entirely subordinate to tactics and psychology... Hatred and contempt must be directed at particular individuals.” - The Goebbels Diaries

As to air pollution, every place is not LA or Denver or China. And again, inventors like Benz and Ford wanted vehicles that could run on cleaner renewable alcohol based fuels. You need to address the people behind making, and keeping, petrol the standard. We hear over and over again, going back decades of the development of water fueled vehicles but they keep disappearing, or threatened, or purchased and moth balled.

What's losing, and surprising me, is your not seeing through the nature of this manipulation.

Our children are in much more danger of geomagnetic reversal, and more especially of geneticly modified organisms and unprincipled(ends rustifies the means) pols, etc.

As Crichton long ago mentioned, men better start worrying their own survival, because the earth will go on without us.

peaceably

Btw ... draggin children into an argument is a tactic that invariably indicates it's a weak argument. Emotional appeals are not reason.