Tesla huh? Nice pull David!-) Bookmarked that good fun, thank you for that pointer!!! (it is so sad the net is going to be so severely censored/controlled in our lifetime) And Hextime, 'what a concept'.

Just off the top, resonance does not speak to:

A - the limited seismic activity for that morning, which is more specific and not elongated, and thus in line with controlled demolition and the actual falling of the three buildings(although there has been a great many decades of fiddle time-as I recall Tesla's papers were immediately seized);

B - then, resonance does not appear to speak to the still molten steel at all the pillar bases when the rubble was still being removed WEEKS later(which also demands temperatures WHICH ARE IMPOSSIBLE to produce with jet fuel-even if it all dripped into the basement unabsorbed along the way);

B1 - in light of B, don't forget the 2 fireballs, and lack of a third one(while investigating who was resident in the third building which was also considerably distant and further significantly shielded by a fourth building between itself(WTC7) and the Towers);

B2 - nor do office furniture/supplies, carpet, drapes or any other of the normal contents of those buildings have the remotest possiblity of creating the necessary tempatures consistent with the actual outcome(s);

C - resonance seems unlikely to speak to the precision of all three buildings landing neatly in their footprints(what is the likelihood?);

C1 - and so quickly at that: a) after the impacts, b) and the descent;

D - although resonance may possibly speak to the lateral explosions that propelled and imbedded girder sections into distant neighboring buildings and blocks distant too, it is doubtful it will account for the precisely burnt/cut steel girders sections(surely still photos remain too);

E1 - which explosions, can be seen and heard in the remaining available footage of early on the scene coverage;

E2 - additionally there is extensive verbal testimony of emergency personnel tapes and citizens, newscasters on the scene at the time describing series of explosions;

F - are not A-E, consistent with CONTROLLED DEMOLITION?

In summary: if a refinement of Tesla's resonance were the answer, wouldn't you agree that that is even more fantastic and frightening than an explanation of controlled demolitions carried out with elements of our governments complicity? Which for my part, if resonance were the answer, the world at large is in even greater danger from this government(all three branches) than many like myself already believe we are.

I remain mindful of the truism about if you are asking the wrong questions, does it matter what the answers are?

Finally, for you/your families safety, you really should stop discussing these controversial subjects. You don't really believe the net is unmonitored do you? It won't be long before these government-questioning topics will officially be jailable offences. We have strayed that far from the Constitution folks(oh, to be sure, it will be dressed up in your safety and the flag). America not only has political prisoners, but the Army is paying Haliburton $385mil for the construction of the CILP:

(Please study carefully, noting the open ended nature of many of the OFFICIAL statements.)

There also was another little-noticed item posted at the U.S. Army Web site, about the Pentagon’s Civilian Inmate Labor Program. This program “provides Army policy and guidance for establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison camps on Army installations.”

The Army document, first drafted in 1997, underwent a “rapid action revision” on Jan. 14, 2005. The revision provides a “template for developing agreements” between the Army and corrections facilities for the use of civilian inmate labor on Army installations.

On its face, the Army’s labor program refers to inmates housed in federal, state and local jails. The Army also cites various federal laws that govern the use of civilian labor and provide for the establishment of prison camps in the United States, including a federal statute that authorizes the Attorney General to “establish, equip, and maintain camps upon sites selected by him” and “make available … the services of United States prisoners” to various government departments, including the Department of Defense.

Though the timing of the document’s posting – within the past few weeks –may just be a coincidence, the reference to a “rapid action revision” and the KBR contract’s contemplation of “rapid development of new programs” have raised eyebrows about why this sudden need for urgency.

These developments also are drawing more attention now because of earlier Bush administration policies to involve the Pentagon in “counter-terrorism” operations inside the United States.

entire original text: http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/022106a.html

That was a good one David!!!