PAT ~ doubling up now... here we go.
Pat,
Honestly, man, how can you support this gang in the Bush world? This is the worst, most obvious, most self-deluding, destructive, hypocritical, cynical, fearmongering, incompetent, divisive, self-serving, ruthless, backwards, rapacious, two-faced, totalitarian, greedy, short-sighted, criminal bunch of marauders to ever hold the White House, and that's really saying something.
Damn David so many derogitory words and all in one sentence. Sure your not talking about the Clinton administration?
That is exactly the kind of response that does NOT address the question. And for good measure throws in the whipping boy for the GOP, you can do better. If I had to chose, (and sadly I have a choice) I'd take an Oral Sex lie over a lie that leads us to a highly questionable"war" anytime. I would also venture to guess that the terms David used were desriptive, not derogitory. The actions of this administration are screaming out to be examined and no major voice, including the alleged "liberal media", is doing a very good job of asking tough questions. And straight answers??.... Forget it. The answer to almost all of the questions that should be being asked.....is Oil.
I mean Harding wasnt above running the federal government like it was his own ATM, but at least he wasnt lobbying for totalitarian control. I'm not entirely naive--I dont expect poltics to be the province of some ascended species of saintly philosophers, but keerist!, this goes far beyond any garden variety graft and sex-party type of Administration. These people seem to be genuinely totalitarian in their thinking, and utterly ruthless and contemptuous of important truths or consequences in their sales pitch to the public.
Totalitarian thinking is that what they call doing what you believe in unilaterally? The sex-party only sent out troops to divert the Lewinsky thing as I recall.
How about doing whats right, as opposed to doing whats profitable.And please Pat raise the chance that you will be taken seriously by calling a liberal a liberal or a Democrat a Democrat. "The sex-party" ?? Come on, please elevate the level of your argument.
What do you like about these people? What is it that they stand for to you? I ask this out of genuine curiousity, cause I just can't understand what people like about this crew.
Even you don't have an answer for this one.
How can we see such different qualities in the same people? I just simply don't get it.
Because we have vastly different perspectives
Which is fine but you need to hear or at least acknowledge the rising voices of dissent. Your dismissal without question is the type of thinking that got us where we are right now. A fictitious President running a fictitious war.
Can you explain to me what's attractive about, say Karl Rove and Dick Cheney? or John Ashcroft? or even jolly old Rummy?
You mean like taking care of the ugly details surrounding the war?
What you call "ugly details" I consider massive ass covering, and spin. keep repeating the lie long enough and loud enough people get tired of hearing it and begin to accept the position. Sad but true.
Pat you provide glib responses to serious questions. I doesn't help you or your level of credability and it certainly doesn't help OUR troops that are being killed daily, so that our country can continue its dependence on a finite supply of oil, rather than looking for cleaner, cheaper alternatives.
Do you even know anybody who is over there, fighting for you? Dying for you. So that we can protect the world from a man who had nothing to do with 9/11, nor does he seem to have any WMD's.
Why are we there?????? What are we achieving. What is the ultimate goal? and where are Osama & Saddaam while we're at it. We can shoot a missle down a chimney (granted it might be a school chimney) but we can find two well known international leaders?????
Ponderous.
