: You mean you can't tell the difference between military retaliation/counter-attack and the purposeful targeting of civilians?
well if they went after their target and avoided innocent 2 month old babies being killed yes pukka...but they knew yes they knew and i heard it from them on channel t'other night they would kill innocent people so that's murder and should be dealt with in the Hague it's a war crime to me �
: Now..IF Israel had used their airforce from the beginning of this most recent conflict, and they chose NOT to, just for the very reason that the Israeli military policy has been to AVOID civilian deaths, the "Palestinian" people would have been annihilated in about 30 minutes, and this past year of conflict would never have happened. and the world would have hopefully found a bit of room with milosevic in the hague too
�
Up to this point, the Israeli military has tried to target ONLY terrorist cells living amongst "Palestinian" people no I don't believe this mate
�Why they chose to use fighters at this time, instead of infantry and tanks, I do not know. �Yes, the deaths of children and innocent civilians is tragic, but was certainly not the intention of the military operation. Intention or not it doesn't mitigate what is murder to me �
: You can't see the difference between an intentional attack upon civilians like 9-11, or the bombing of schoolbuses, and market places(where obviously the MAIN targets are civilians, not soldiers), and a military response to such attacks? yes I can eugene�
: Let's take a hypothetical example. You live in England, correct? yes(I am not sure...you are now) �A certain group (the cornish)within your country wants their own territory, rights and self-government, and they wish to use acts of violence to accomplish their aims. �They plant bombs in market places, buses, and subways. �Are these military targets, or will the majority of casualties be civilians? �
: The British Army then sends out soldiers and tanks etc..on a search and destroy mission for the perpetrators. �Is this an act of "terrorism" though? �Yes, innocent civilians may be killed in the process, but is this an act of planned terrorism? ayuh!
: If the same scenario took place on American soil (and it may do so shortly, based upon information we are now learning), would American military response be "terrorism"? ayuh again! �
Re: Israel/Amerika You're fucked
mick
location: Shambala
listening to: Sounds that can’t be made
registered: 2001.10.26
posts: 5118
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
–--
a truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent
a truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent
mick
(view)
: You mean you can't tell the difference between military retaliation/counter-attack and the purposeful targeting of civilians?
well if they went after their target and avoided innocent 2 month old babies being killed yes pukka...but they knew yes they knew and i heard it from them on channel t'other night they would kill innocent people so that's murder and should be dealt with in the Hague it's a war crime to me �
: Now..IF Israel had used their airforce from the beginning of this most recent conflict, and they chose NOT to, just for the very reason that the Israeli military policy has been to AVOID civilian deaths, the "Palestinian" people would have been annihilated in about 30 minutes, and this past year of conflict would never have happened. and the world would have hopefully found a bit of room with milosevic in the hague too
�
Up to this point, the Israeli military has tried to target ONLY terrorist cells living amongst "Palestinian" people no I don't believe this mate
�Why they chose to use fighters at this time, instead of infantry and tanks, I do not know. �Yes, the deaths of children and innocent civilians is tragic, but was certainly not the intention of the military operation. Intention or not it doesn't mitigate what is murder to me �
: You can't see the difference between an intentional attack upon civilians like 9-11, or the bombing of schoolbuses, and market places(where obviously the MAIN targets are civilians, not soldiers), and a military response to such attacks? yes I can eugene�
: Let's take a hypothetical example. You live in England, correct? yes(I am not sure...you are now) �A certain group (the cornish)within your country wants their own territory, rights and self-government, and they wish to use acts of violence to accomplish their aims. �They plant bombs in market places, buses, and subways. �Are these military targets, or will the majority of casualties be civilians? �
: The British Army then sends out soldiers and tanks etc..on a search and destroy mission for the perpetrators. �Is this an act of "terrorism" though? �Yes, innocent civilians may be killed in the process, but is this an act of planned terrorism? ayuh!
: If the same scenario took place on American soil (and it may do so shortly, based upon information we are now learning), would American military response be "terrorism"? ayuh again! �
well if they went after their target and avoided innocent 2 month old babies being killed yes pukka...but they knew yes they knew and i heard it from them on channel t'other night they would kill innocent people so that's murder and should be dealt with in the Hague it's a war crime to me �
: Now..IF Israel had used their airforce from the beginning of this most recent conflict, and they chose NOT to, just for the very reason that the Israeli military policy has been to AVOID civilian deaths, the "Palestinian" people would have been annihilated in about 30 minutes, and this past year of conflict would never have happened. and the world would have hopefully found a bit of room with milosevic in the hague too
�
Up to this point, the Israeli military has tried to target ONLY terrorist cells living amongst "Palestinian" people no I don't believe this mate
�Why they chose to use fighters at this time, instead of infantry and tanks, I do not know. �Yes, the deaths of children and innocent civilians is tragic, but was certainly not the intention of the military operation. Intention or not it doesn't mitigate what is murder to me �
: You can't see the difference between an intentional attack upon civilians like 9-11, or the bombing of schoolbuses, and market places(where obviously the MAIN targets are civilians, not soldiers), and a military response to such attacks? yes I can eugene�
: Let's take a hypothetical example. You live in England, correct? yes(I am not sure...you are now) �A certain group (the cornish)within your country wants their own territory, rights and self-government, and they wish to use acts of violence to accomplish their aims. �They plant bombs in market places, buses, and subways. �Are these military targets, or will the majority of casualties be civilians? �
: The British Army then sends out soldiers and tanks etc..on a search and destroy mission for the perpetrators. �Is this an act of "terrorism" though? �Yes, innocent civilians may be killed in the process, but is this an act of planned terrorism? ayuh!
: If the same scenario took place on American soil (and it may do so shortly, based upon information we are now learning), would American military response be "terrorism"? ayuh again! �
–--
a truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent
a truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent
