>>Welcome back, Richard. Nice to see you're >>still crazy after all these months.
Nothing gets past you does it?
It seemed like the charitable thing to do to lay low & shut up for a while, but after the equally idiotic posting of 'Ari Fleischer' I thought now is the time to mix it up again. But after your suggestion of 'reeling it in', I'll do that.
That being said, could you clarify why the Nazi's weren't Socialists in light of the the NRO articles I posted some months back ('Springtime For Slanderers' was one) It's interesting that if the right wing can be compared to the Nazi's, the left certainly manifest aspects of pretty hardcore Stalinism (does the word 'Vanguardism' mean anything to you?)
Secondly, where it's unquestionable that Clinton left a surplus, why does that seem to have to come at the cost of WW2 sized taxes and so much government waste? How do you propose to balance the two extremes of a reasonable tax package and reasonable spending? Next time you look at http://www.cagw.org, take a calculator, tot up the waste and then get back to me about where the deficit came from.
Re: Werlcome Back Richard III
R
Rush
(view)
>>Welcome back, Richard. Nice to see you're >>still crazy after all these months.
Nothing gets past you does it?
It seemed like the charitable thing to do to lay low & shut up for a while, but after the equally idiotic posting of 'Ari Fleischer' I thought now is the time to mix it up again. But after your suggestion of 'reeling it in', I'll do that.
That being said, could you clarify why the Nazi's weren't Socialists in light of the the NRO articles I posted some months back ('Springtime For Slanderers' was one) It's interesting that if the right wing can be compared to the Nazi's, the left certainly manifest aspects of pretty hardcore Stalinism (does the word 'Vanguardism' mean anything to you?)
Secondly, where it's unquestionable that Clinton left a surplus, why does that seem to have to come at the cost of WW2 sized taxes and so much government waste? How do you propose to balance the two extremes of a reasonable tax package and reasonable spending? Next time you look at http://www.cagw.org, take a calculator, tot up the waste and then get back to me about where the deficit came from.
Nothing gets past you does it?
It seemed like the charitable thing to do to lay low & shut up for a while, but after the equally idiotic posting of 'Ari Fleischer' I thought now is the time to mix it up again. But after your suggestion of 'reeling it in', I'll do that.
That being said, could you clarify why the Nazi's weren't Socialists in light of the the NRO articles I posted some months back ('Springtime For Slanderers' was one) It's interesting that if the right wing can be compared to the Nazi's, the left certainly manifest aspects of pretty hardcore Stalinism (does the word 'Vanguardism' mean anything to you?)
Secondly, where it's unquestionable that Clinton left a surplus, why does that seem to have to come at the cost of WW2 sized taxes and so much government waste? How do you propose to balance the two extremes of a reasonable tax package and reasonable spending? Next time you look at http://www.cagw.org, take a calculator, tot up the waste and then get back to me about where the deficit came from.
