: On the other hand, as my friend and tormentor Dan Schwartz has pointed out, "Fifth Beatle" verges on sacrilege.
I agree totally %100 without a doubt for sure. I had reservations about using that term (the 5th Beatle) as I usually cringe at just about ANYONE covering Beatles songs. I think Beatle songs should stay on Beatle records.
Dan
Dan
location: WV➔VA➔FL➔WV➔OH
listening to: so many intros
registered: 1997.08.29
posts: 2698
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
–--
from memories the present and future can be adorned ~Andrea
from memories the present and future can be adorned ~Andrea
Dan
(view)
: On the other hand, as my friend and tormentor Dan Schwartz has pointed out, "Fifth Beatle" verges on sacrilege.
I agree totally %100 without a doubt for sure. I had reservations about using that term (the 5th Beatle) as I usually cringe at just about ANYONE covering Beatles songs. I think Beatle songs should stay on Beatle records.
Dan
I agree totally %100 without a doubt for sure. I had reservations about using that term (the 5th Beatle) as I usually cringe at just about ANYONE covering Beatles songs. I think Beatle songs should stay on Beatle records.
Dan
–--
from memories the present and future can be adorned ~Andrea
from memories the present and future can be adorned ~Andrea
