"OSAMAGATE"
by Michel Chossudovsky
Professor of Economics, University of OttawaCentre for Research on Globalisation (CRG),
Montréal
Posted at globalresearch.ca 9 October 2001-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------Confronted with mounting evidence, the US
Administration can no longer deny its links to
Osama. While the CIA admits that Osama bin
Laden was an "intelligence asset" during the
Cold War, the relationship is said to "go way
back". Most news reports consider that these
Osama-CIA links belong to the "bygone era" of
the Soviet-Afghan war. They are invariably
viewed as "irrelevant" to an understanding of
present events. Lost in the barrage of recent
history, the role of the CIA in supporting and
developing international terrorist organisations
during the Cold war and its aftermath is casually
ignored or downplayed by the Western media. Yes, We did support Him, but "He Went Against
Us" A blatant example of media distortion is the
so-called "blowback" thesis: "intelligence
assets" are said to "have gone against their
sponsors"; "what we've created blows back in
our face."1 In a twisted logic, the US government
and the CIA are portrayed as the ill-fated victims:
The sophisticated methods taught to the
Mujahideen, and the thousands of tons of arms
supplied to them by the US - and Britain - are
now tormenting the West in the phenomenon
known as `blowback', whereby a policy strategy
rebounds on its own devisers. 2
The US media, nonetheless, concedes that "the
Taliban's coming to power [in 1995] is partly the
outcome of the U.S. support of the Mujahideen,
the radical Islamic group, in the 1980s in the
war against the Soviet Union".3 But it also
readily dismisses its own factual statements
and concludes in chorus, that the CIA had been
tricked by a deceitful Osama. It's like "a son
going against his father". The "blowback" thesis is a fabrication. The
evidence amply confirms that the CIA never
severed its ties to the "Islamic Militant Network".
Since the end of the Cold War, these covert
intelligence links have not only been
maintained, they have in fact become
increasingly sophisticated. New undercover initiatives financed by the
Golden Crescent drug trade were set in motion
in Central Asia, the Caucasus and the Balkans.
Pakistan's military and intelligence apparatus
(controlled by the CIA) essentially "served as a
catalyst for the disintegration of the Soviet Union
and the emergence of six new Muslim republics
in Central Asia." 4 Replicating the Iran Contragate Pattern Remember Ollie North and the Nicaraguan
Contras under the Reagan Administration when
weapons financed by the drug trade were
channeled to "freedom fighters" in Washington's
covert war against the Sandinista government.
The same pattern was used in the Balkans to
arm and equip the Mujahideen fighting in the
ranks of the Bosnian Muslim army against the
Armed Forces of the Yugoslav Federation. Throughout the 1990s, the Pakistan Inter
Services Intelligence (ISI) was used by the CIA
as a go-between -- to channel weapons and
Mujahideen mercenaries to the Bosnian Muslim
Army in the civil war in Yugoslavia. According to
a report of the London based International
Media Corporation:
"Reliable sources report that the United States
is now [1994] actively participating in the arming
and training of the Muslim forces of
Bosnia-Herzegovina in direct contravention of
the United Nations accords. US agencies have
been providing weapons made in ... China
(PRC), North Korea (DPRK) and Iran. The
sources indicated that ... Iran, with the
knowledge and agreement of the US
Government, supplied the Bosnian forces with a
large number of multiple rocket launchers and a
large quantity of ammunition. These included
107mm and 122mm rockets from the PRC, and
VBR-230 multiple rocket launchers ... made in
Iran. ... It was [also] reported that 400 members
of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard (Pasdaran)
arrived in Bosnia with a large supply of arms
and ammunition. It was alleged that the US
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had full
knowledge of the operation and that the CIA
believed that some of the 400 had been
detached for future terrorist operations in
Western Europe. During September and October [1994], there
has been a stream of "Afghan" Mujahedin ...
covertly landed in Ploce, Croatia (South-West of
Mostar) from where they have traveled with false
papers ... before deploying with the Bosnian
Muslim forces in the Kupres, Zenica and Banja
Luka areas. These forces have recently [late
1994] experienced a significant degree of
military success. They have, according to
sources in Sarajevo, been aided by the
UNPROFOR Bangladesh battalion, which took
over from a French battalion early in September
[1994]. The Mujahedin landing at Ploce are reported to
have been accompanied by US Special Forces
equipped with high-tech communications
equipment, ... The sources said that the
mission of the US troops was to establish a
command, control, communications and
intelligence network to coordinate and support
Bosnian Muslim offensives -- in concert with
Mujahideen and Bosnian Croat forces -- in
Kupres, Zenica and Banja Luka. Some
offensives have recently been conducted from
within the UN-established safe-havens in the
Zenica and Banja Luka regions. (...) The US Administration has not restricted its
involvement to the clandestine contravention of
the UN arms embargo on the region ... It [also]
committed three high-ranking delegations over
the past two years [prior to 1994] in failed
attempts to bring the Yugoslav Government into
line with US policy. Yugoslavia is the only state
in the region to have failed to acquiesce to US
pressure.5
"From the Horse's Mouth" Ironically, the US Administration's undercover
military-intelligence operations in Bosnia have
been fully documented by the Republican Party.
A lengthy Congressional report by the
Republican Party Committee (RPC) published
in 1997, largely confirms the International Media
Corporation report quoted above. The RPC
Congressional report accuses the Clinton
administration of having "helped turn Bosnia
into a militant Islamic base" leading to the
recruitment through the so-called "Militant
Islamic Network," of thousands of Mujahideen
from the Muslim world:
Perhaps most threatening to the SFOR mission
- and more importantly, to the safety of the
American personnel serving in Bosnia - is the
unwillingness of the Clinton Administration to
come clean with the Congress and with the
American people about its complicity in the
delivery of weapons from Iran to the Muslim
government in Sarajevo. That policy, personally
approved by Bill Clinton in April 1994 at the
urging of CIA Director-designate (and then-NSC
chief) Anthony Lake and the U.S. ambassador to
Croatia Peter Galbraith, has, according to the
Los Angeles Times (citing classified
intelligence community sources), "played a
central role in the dramatic increase in Iranian
influence in Bosnia. (...) Along with the weapons, Iranian Revolutionary
Guards and VEVAK intelligence operatives
entered Bosnia in large numbers, along with
thousands of mujahedin ("holy warriors") from
across the Muslim world. Also engaged in the
effort were several other Muslim countries
(including Brunei, Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi
Arabia, Sudan, and Turkey) and a number of
radical Muslim organizations. For example, the
role of one Sudan-based "humanitarian
organization," called the Third World Relief
Agency, has been well documented. The Clinton
Administration's "hands-on" involvement with
the Islamic network's arms pipeline included
inspections of missiles from Iran by U.S.
government officials... the Third World Relief
Agency (TWRA), a Sudan-based, phoney
humanitarian organization ... has been a major
link in the arms pipeline to Bosnia. ... TWRA is
believed to be connected with such fixtures of
the Islamic terror network as Sheik Omar Abdel
Rahman (the convicted mastermind behind the
1993 World Trade Center bombing) and Osama
Bin Laden, a wealthy Saudi émigré believed to
bankroll numerous militant groups.
[Washington Post, 9/22/96] 6
Complicity of the Clinton Administration In other words, the Republican Party Committee
report confirms unequivocally the complicity of
the Clinton Administration with several Islamic
fundamentalist organisations including Osama
bin Laden's al Qaeda. The Republicans wanted at the time to
undermine the Clinton Administration. However,
at a time when the entire country had its eyes
riveted on the Monica Lewinsky scandal, the
Republicans no doubt chose not to trigger an
untimely "Iran-Bosniagate" affair, which might
have unduly diverted public attention away from
the Lewinsky scandal. The Republicans wanted
to impeach Bill Clinton "for having lied to the
American People" regarding his affair with White
House intern Monica Lewinsky. On the more
substantive "foreign policy lies" regarding drug
running and covert operations in the Balkans,
Democrats and Republicans agreed in unison,
no doubt pressured by the Pentagon and the
CIA not to "spill the beans". From Bosnia to Kosovo The "Bosnian pattern" described in the 1997
Congressional RPC report was replicated in
Kosovo. With the complicity of NATO and the US
State Department. Mujahideen mercenaries
from the Middle East and Central Asia were
recruited to fight in the ranks of the Kosovo
Liberation Army (KLA) in 1998-99, largely
supporting NATO's war effort. Confirmed by British military sources, the task of
arming and training of the KLA had been
entrusted in 1998 to the US Defence
Intelligence Agency (DIA) and Britain's Secret
Intelligence Services MI6, together with "former
and serving members of 22 SAS [Britain's 22nd
Special Air Services Regiment], as well as three
British and American private security
companies".7
The US DIA approached MI6 to arrange a
training programme for the KLA, said a senior
British military source. `MI6 then sub-contracted
the operation to two British security companies,
who in turn approached a number of former
members of the (22 SAS) regiment. Lists were
then drawn up of weapons and equipment
needed by the KLA.' While these covert
operations were continuing, serving members
of 22 SAS Regiment, mostly from the unit's D
Squadron, were first deployed in Kosovo before
the beginning of the bombing campaign in
March. 8
While British SAS Special Forces in bases in
Northern Albania were training the KLA, military
instructors from Turkey and Afghanistan
financed by the "Islamic jihad" were
collaborating in training the KLA in guerilla and
diversion tactics.9:
Bin Laden had visited Albania himself. He was
one of several fundamentalist groups that had
sent units to fight in Kosovo, ... Bin Laden is
believed to have established an operation in
Albania in 1994 ... Albanian sources say Sali
Berisha, who was then president, had links with
some groups that later proved to be extreme
fundamentalists. 10
Congressional Testimonies on KLA-Osama
links According to Frank Ciluffo of the Globalized
Organised Crime Program, in a testimony
presented to the House of Representatives
Judicial Committee:
What was largely hidden from public view was
the fact that the KLA raise part of their funds
from the sale of narcotics. Albania and Kosovo
lie at the heart of the "Balkan Route" that links
the "Golden Crescent" of Afghanistan and
Pakistan to the drug markets of Europe. This
route is worth an estimated $400 billion a year
and handles 80 percent of heroin destined for
Europe. 11
According to Ralf Mutschke of Interpol's Criminal
Intelligence division also in a testimony to the
House Judicial Committee:
The U.S. State Department listed the KLA as a
terrorist organization, indicating that it was
financing its operations with money from the
international heroin trade and loans from
Islamic countries and individuals, among them
allegedly Usama bin Laden" . Another link to bin
Laden is the fact that the brother of a leader in
an Egyptian Jihad organization and also a
military commander of Usama bin Laden, was
leading an elite KLA unit during the Kosovo
conflict. 12
Madeleine Albright Covets the KLA These KLA links to international terrorism and
organised crime documented by the US
Congress were totally ignored by the Clinton
Administration. In fact, in the months preceding
the bombing of Yugoslavia, Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright was busy building a "political
legitimacy" for the KLA. The paramilitary army
had --from one day to the next-- been elevated to
the status of a bona fide "democratic" force in
Kosovo. In turn, Madeleine Albright has forced
the pace of international diplomacy: the KLA had
been spearheaded into playing a central role in
the failed "peace negotiations" at Rambouiillet
in early 1999. The Senate and the House tacitly endorse State
Terrorism While the various Congressional reports
confirmed that the US government had been
working hand in glove with Osama bin Laden's
Al Qaeda, this did not prevent the Clinton and
later the Bush Administration from arming and
equipping the KLA. The Congressional
documents also confirm that members of the
Senate and the House knew the relationship of
the Administration to international terrorism. To
quote the statement of Rep. John Kasich of the
House Armed Services Committee: "We
connected ourselves [in 1998-99] with the KLA,
which was the staging point for bin Laden..." 13 In the wake of the tragic events of September
11, Republicans and Democrats in unison have
given their full support to the President to "wage
war on Osama". In 1999, Senator Jo Lieberman had stated
authoritatively that "Fighting for the KLA is
fighting for human rights and American values."
In the hours following the October 7 missile
attacks on Afghanistan, the same Jo Lieberman
called for punitive air strikes against Iraq: "We're
in a war against terrorism... We can't stop with
bin Laden and the Taliban." Yet Senator Jo
Lieberman, as member of the Armed Services
Committee of the Senate had access to all the
Congressional documents pertaining to
"KLA-Osama" links. In making this statement,
he was fully aware that that agencies of the US
government as well as NATO were supporting
international terrorism. The War in Macedonia In the wake of the 1999 war in Yugoslavia, the
terrorist activities of the KLA were extended into
Southern Serbia and Macedonia. Meanwhile,
the KLA --renamed the Kosovo Protection Corps
(KPC)-- was elevated to United Nations status,
implying the granting of "legitimate" sources of
funding through United Nations as well as
through bilateral channels, including direct US
military aid. And barely two months after the official
inauguration of the KPC under UN auspices
(September 1999), KPC-KLA commanders -
using UN resources and equipment - were
already preparing the assaults into Macedonia,
as a logical follow-up to their terrorist activities
in Kosovo. According to the Skopje daily
Dnevnik, the KPC had established a "sixth
operation zone" in Southern Serbia and
Macedonia:
Sources, who insist on anonymity, claim that the
headquarters of the Kosovo protection brigades
[i.e. linked to the UN sponsored KPC] have
[March 2000] already been formed in Tetovo,
Gostivar and Skopje. They are being prepared in
Debar and Struga [on the border with Albania]
as well, and their members have defined codes.
14
According to the BBC, "Western special forces
were still training the guerrillas" meaning that
they were assisting the KLA in opening up "a
sixth operation zone" in Southern Serbia and
Macedonia. 15 "The Islamic Militant Network" and NATO join
hands in Macedonia Among the foreign mercenaries now fighting in
Macedonia (October 2001) in the ranks of
self-proclaimed National Liberation Army (NLA),
are Mujahideen from the Middle East and the
Central Asian republics of the former Soviet
Union. Also within the KLA's proxy force in
Macedonia are senior US military advisers from
a private mercenary outfit on contract to the
Pentagon as well as "soldiers of fortune" from
Britain, Holland and Germany. Some of these
Western mercenaries had previously fought with
the KLA and the Bosnian Muslim Army. 16 Extensively documented by the Macedonian
press and statements of the Macedonian
authorities, the US government and the "Islamic
Militant Network" are working hand in glove in
supporting and financing the self-proclaimed
National Liberation Army (NLA), involved in the
terrorist attacks in Macedonia. The NLA is a
proxy of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). In
turn the KLA and the UN sponsored Kosovo
Protection Corps (KPC) are identical institutions
with the same commanders and military
personnel. KPC Commanders on UN salaries
are fighting in the NLA together with the
Mujahideen. In a bitter twist, while supported and financed by
Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda, the KLA-NLA is
also supported by NATO and the United Nations
mission to Kosovo (UNMIK). In fact, the "Islamic
Militant Network" --also using Pakistan's Inter
Service Intelligence (ISI) as the CIA's
go-between-- still constitutes an integral part of
Washington's covert military-intelligence
operations in Macedonia and Southern Serbia. The KLA-NLA terrorists are funded from US
military aid, the United Nations peace-keeping
budget as well as by several Islamic
organisations including Osama bin Laden's Al
Qaeda. Drug money is also being used to
finance the terrorists with the complicity of the
US government. The recruitment of Mujahideen
to fight in the ranks of the NLA in Macedonia is
implemented through various Islamic groups. US military advisers mingle with Mujahideen
within the same paramilitary force, Western
mercenaries from NATO countries fight
alongside Mujahideen recruited in the Middle
East and Central Asia. And the US media calls
this a "blowback" where so-called "intelligence
assets" have gone against their sponsors! But this did not happen during the Cold war! It is
happening right now in Macedonia. And it is
confirmed by numerous press reports,
eyewitness accounts, photographic evidence as
well as official statements by the Macedonian
Prime Minister, who has accused the Western
military alliance of supporting the terrorists.
Moreover, the official Macedonian New Agency
(MIA) has pointed to the complicity between
Washington's envoy Ambassador James
Pardew and the NLA terrorists. 17 In other
words, the so-called "intelligence assets" are
still serving the interests of their US sponsors. Pardew's background is revealing in this regard.
He started his Balkans career in 1993 as a
senior intelligence officer for the Joint Chiefs of
Staff responsible for channeling US aid to the
Bosnian Muslim Army. Coronel Pardew had
been put in charge of arranging the "air-drops"
of supplies to Bosnian forces. At the time, these
"air drops" were tagged as "civilian aid". It later
transpired --confirmed by the RPC
Congressional report-- that the US had violated
the arms embargo. And James Pardew played
an important role as part of the team of
intelligence officials working closely with the
Chairman of the National Security Council
Anthony Lake. Pardew was later involved in the Dayton
negotiations (1995) on behalf of the US Defence
Department. In 1999, prior to the bombing of
Yugoslavia, he was appointed "Special
Representative for Military Stabilisation and
Kosovo Implementation" by President Clinton.
One of his tasks was to channel support to the
Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), which at the time
was also being supported by Osama bin Laden.
Pardew was in this regard instrumental in
replicating the "Bosnian pattern" in Kosovo and
subsequently in Macedonia... Justification for Waging War The Bush Administration has stated that it has
proof that Osama bin Laden is behind the
attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon. In the
words of British Prime Minister Tony Blair: "I
have seen absolutely powerful and
incontrovertible evidence of his [Osama] link to
the events of the 11th of September." 18 What
Tony Blair fails to mention is that agencies of
the US government including the CIA continue to
"harbor" Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda. A major war supposedly "against international
terrorism" has been launched by a government
which is harboring international terrorism as
part of its foreign policy agenda. In other words,
the main justification for waging war has been
totally fabricated. The American people have
been deliberately and consciously misled by
their government into supporting a major
military adventure which affects our collective
future. This decision to mislead the American people
was taken barely a few hours after the terrorist
attacks on the World Trade Centre. Without
supporting evidence, Osama had already been
tagged as the "prime suspect." Two days later
on Thursday the 13th of September --while the
FBI investigations had barely commenced--
President Bush pledged to "lead the world to
victory". The Administration confirmed its
intention to embark on "a sustained military
campaign rather than a single dramatic action"
directed against Osama bin Laden. 19 In
addition to Afghanistan, a number of countries
in the Middle East were mentioned as possible
targets including Iraq, Iran, Libya and the Sudan.
And several prominent US political figures and
media pundits have demanded that the air
strikes be extended to other countries "which
harbour international terrorism." According to
intelligence sources, Osama bin Laden's al
Qaeda has operations in some 50 to 60
countries providing ample pretext to intervene in
several "rogue states" in the Middle East and
Central Asia. Moreover, the entire US Legislature --with only
one honest and courageous dissenting voice in
the House of Representatives-- has tacitly
endorsed the Administration's decision to go
war. Members of the House and the Senate
have access through the various committees to
official confidential reports and intelligence
documents which prove beyond doubt that
agencies of the US government have ties to
international terrorism. They cannot say "we did
not know". In fact, most of this evidence is in the
public domain. Under the historical resolution of the US
Congress adopted by both the House and the
Senate on the 14th of September:
The president is authorized to use all necessary
and appropriate force against those nations,
organizations, or persons he determines
planned, authorized, committed, or aided the
terrorist attacks that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001,
or harbored such organizations or persons, in
order to prevent any future acts of international
terrorism against the United States by such
nations, organizations or persons.
Whereas there is no evidence that agencies of
the US government "aided the terrorist attacks"
on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon,
there is ample and detailed evidence that
agencies of the US government as well as
NATO, have since the end of the Cold War
continued to "harbor such organizations". Patriotism cannot be based on a falsehood,
particularly when it constitutes a pretext for
waging war and killing innocent civilians. Ironically, the text of the Congressional
resolution also constitutes a "blowback" against
the US sponsors of international terrorism. The
resolution does not exclude the conduct of an
"Osamagate" inquiry, as well as appropriate
actions against agencies and/or individuals of
the US government, who may have collaborated
with Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda. And the
evidence indelibly points directly to the Bush
Administration.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------Notes
1. United Press International (UPI), 15
September 2001. 2. The Guardian, London, 15 September 2001. 3. UPI, op cit, 4. For further details see Michel Chossudovsky,
Who is Osama bin Laden, Centre for Research
on Globalisation, 12 September 2001,
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html. 5. International Media Corporation Defense and
Strategy Policy, US Commits Forces, Weapons
to Bosnia, London, 31 October 1994. 6. Congressional Press Release, Republican
Party Committee (RPC), US Congress,
Clinton-Approved Iranian Arms Transfers Help
Turn Bosnia into Militant Islamic Base, 16
January 1997, available on the website of the
Centre of Research on Globalisation (CRG) at
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/DCH109A.html.
The original document is on the website of the
US Senate Republican Party Committee
(Senator Larry Craig), at
http://www.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1997/iran.h
tm) 7. The Scotsman, Glasgow, 29 August 1999. 8. Ibid. 9. Truth in Media, Kosovo in Crisis, Phoenix,
Arizona, 2 April 1999 10. Sunday Times, London, 29 November 1998. 11. US Congress, Testimony of Frank J. Cilluffo
, Deputy Director, Global Organized Crime,
Program director to the House Judiciary
Committee, 13 December 2000. 12. US Congress, Testimony of Ralf Mutschke
of Interpol's Criminal Intelligence Division, to the
House Judicial Committee, 13 December 2000. 13. US Congress, Transcripts of the House
Armed Services Committee, 5 October 1999, 14. Macedonian Information Centre Newsletter,
Skopje, 21 March 2000, published by BBC
Summary of World Broadcast, 24 March 2000. 15. BBC, 29 January 2001, at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/ne
wsid_1142000/1142478.stm) 16. Scotland on Sunday, Glasgow, 15 June
2001 at
http://www.scotlandonsunday.com/text_only.cfm
?id=SS01025960, see also UPI, 9 July 2001.
For further details see Michel Chossudovsky,
Washington behind Terrorist Assaults in
Macedonia, Centre for Research on
Globalisation, August 2001, at
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO108B.html.
) 17. Macedonian Information Agency (MIA), 26
September 2001, available at the Centre for
Research on Globalisation at
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MNA110A.html 18. Quoted in The Daily Telegraph, London, 1
October 2001. 19. Statement by official following the speech by
President George Bush on 14 September 2001
quoted in the International Herald Tribune,
Paris, 14 September 2001. -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------The URL of this article is:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO110A.html Copyright, Michel Chossudovsky, Centre for
Research on Globalisation (CRG), October
2001. All rights reserved. Permission is granted
to post this text on non-commercial community
internet sites, provided the source and the URL
are indicated, the essay remains intact and the
copyright note is displayed. To publish this text
in printed and/or other forms, including
commercial Internet sites and excerpts, contact
the Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG)
at [email protected], fax
1-514-4256224.
B
Baerwald
(view)
"OSAMAGATE"
by Michel Chossudovsky
Professor of Economics, University of OttawaCentre for Research on Globalisation (CRG),
Montréal
Posted at globalresearch.ca 9 October 2001-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------Confronted with mounting evidence, the US
Administration can no longer deny its links to
Osama. While the CIA admits that Osama bin
Laden was an "intelligence asset" during the
Cold War, the relationship is said to "go way
back". Most news reports consider that these
Osama-CIA links belong to the "bygone era" of
the Soviet-Afghan war. They are invariably
viewed as "irrelevant" to an understanding of
present events. Lost in the barrage of recent
history, the role of the CIA in supporting and
developing international terrorist organisations
during the Cold war and its aftermath is casually
ignored or downplayed by the Western media. Yes, We did support Him, but "He Went Against
Us" A blatant example of media distortion is the
so-called "blowback" thesis: "intelligence
assets" are said to "have gone against their
sponsors"; "what we've created blows back in
our face."1 In a twisted logic, the US government
and the CIA are portrayed as the ill-fated victims:
The sophisticated methods taught to the
Mujahideen, and the thousands of tons of arms
supplied to them by the US - and Britain - are
now tormenting the West in the phenomenon
known as `blowback', whereby a policy strategy
rebounds on its own devisers. 2
The US media, nonetheless, concedes that "the
Taliban's coming to power [in 1995] is partly the
outcome of the U.S. support of the Mujahideen,
the radical Islamic group, in the 1980s in the
war against the Soviet Union".3 But it also
readily dismisses its own factual statements
and concludes in chorus, that the CIA had been
tricked by a deceitful Osama. It's like "a son
going against his father". The "blowback" thesis is a fabrication. The
evidence amply confirms that the CIA never
severed its ties to the "Islamic Militant Network".
Since the end of the Cold War, these covert
intelligence links have not only been
maintained, they have in fact become
increasingly sophisticated. New undercover initiatives financed by the
Golden Crescent drug trade were set in motion
in Central Asia, the Caucasus and the Balkans.
Pakistan's military and intelligence apparatus
(controlled by the CIA) essentially "served as a
catalyst for the disintegration of the Soviet Union
and the emergence of six new Muslim republics
in Central Asia." 4 Replicating the Iran Contragate Pattern Remember Ollie North and the Nicaraguan
Contras under the Reagan Administration when
weapons financed by the drug trade were
channeled to "freedom fighters" in Washington's
covert war against the Sandinista government.
The same pattern was used in the Balkans to
arm and equip the Mujahideen fighting in the
ranks of the Bosnian Muslim army against the
Armed Forces of the Yugoslav Federation. Throughout the 1990s, the Pakistan Inter
Services Intelligence (ISI) was used by the CIA
as a go-between -- to channel weapons and
Mujahideen mercenaries to the Bosnian Muslim
Army in the civil war in Yugoslavia. According to
a report of the London based International
Media Corporation:
"Reliable sources report that the United States
is now [1994] actively participating in the arming
and training of the Muslim forces of
Bosnia-Herzegovina in direct contravention of
the United Nations accords. US agencies have
been providing weapons made in ... China
(PRC), North Korea (DPRK) and Iran. The
sources indicated that ... Iran, with the
knowledge and agreement of the US
Government, supplied the Bosnian forces with a
large number of multiple rocket launchers and a
large quantity of ammunition. These included
107mm and 122mm rockets from the PRC, and
VBR-230 multiple rocket launchers ... made in
Iran. ... It was [also] reported that 400 members
of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard (Pasdaran)
arrived in Bosnia with a large supply of arms
and ammunition. It was alleged that the US
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had full
knowledge of the operation and that the CIA
believed that some of the 400 had been
detached for future terrorist operations in
Western Europe. During September and October [1994], there
has been a stream of "Afghan" Mujahedin ...
covertly landed in Ploce, Croatia (South-West of
Mostar) from where they have traveled with false
papers ... before deploying with the Bosnian
Muslim forces in the Kupres, Zenica and Banja
Luka areas. These forces have recently [late
1994] experienced a significant degree of
military success. They have, according to
sources in Sarajevo, been aided by the
UNPROFOR Bangladesh battalion, which took
over from a French battalion early in September
[1994]. The Mujahedin landing at Ploce are reported to
have been accompanied by US Special Forces
equipped with high-tech communications
equipment, ... The sources said that the
mission of the US troops was to establish a
command, control, communications and
intelligence network to coordinate and support
Bosnian Muslim offensives -- in concert with
Mujahideen and Bosnian Croat forces -- in
Kupres, Zenica and Banja Luka. Some
offensives have recently been conducted from
within the UN-established safe-havens in the
Zenica and Banja Luka regions. (...) The US Administration has not restricted its
involvement to the clandestine contravention of
the UN arms embargo on the region ... It [also]
committed three high-ranking delegations over
the past two years [prior to 1994] in failed
attempts to bring the Yugoslav Government into
line with US policy. Yugoslavia is the only state
in the region to have failed to acquiesce to US
pressure.5
"From the Horse's Mouth" Ironically, the US Administration's undercover
military-intelligence operations in Bosnia have
been fully documented by the Republican Party.
A lengthy Congressional report by the
Republican Party Committee (RPC) published
in 1997, largely confirms the International Media
Corporation report quoted above. The RPC
Congressional report accuses the Clinton
administration of having "helped turn Bosnia
into a militant Islamic base" leading to the
recruitment through the so-called "Militant
Islamic Network," of thousands of Mujahideen
from the Muslim world:
Perhaps most threatening to the SFOR mission
- and more importantly, to the safety of the
American personnel serving in Bosnia - is the
unwillingness of the Clinton Administration to
come clean with the Congress and with the
American people about its complicity in the
delivery of weapons from Iran to the Muslim
government in Sarajevo. That policy, personally
approved by Bill Clinton in April 1994 at the
urging of CIA Director-designate (and then-NSC
chief) Anthony Lake and the U.S. ambassador to
Croatia Peter Galbraith, has, according to the
Los Angeles Times (citing classified
intelligence community sources), "played a
central role in the dramatic increase in Iranian
influence in Bosnia. (...) Along with the weapons, Iranian Revolutionary
Guards and VEVAK intelligence operatives
entered Bosnia in large numbers, along with
thousands of mujahedin ("holy warriors") from
across the Muslim world. Also engaged in the
effort were several other Muslim countries
(including Brunei, Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi
Arabia, Sudan, and Turkey) and a number of
radical Muslim organizations. For example, the
role of one Sudan-based "humanitarian
organization," called the Third World Relief
Agency, has been well documented. The Clinton
Administration's "hands-on" involvement with
the Islamic network's arms pipeline included
inspections of missiles from Iran by U.S.
government officials... the Third World Relief
Agency (TWRA), a Sudan-based, phoney
humanitarian organization ... has been a major
link in the arms pipeline to Bosnia. ... TWRA is
believed to be connected with such fixtures of
the Islamic terror network as Sheik Omar Abdel
Rahman (the convicted mastermind behind the
1993 World Trade Center bombing) and Osama
Bin Laden, a wealthy Saudi émigré believed to
bankroll numerous militant groups.
[Washington Post, 9/22/96] 6
Complicity of the Clinton Administration In other words, the Republican Party Committee
report confirms unequivocally the complicity of
the Clinton Administration with several Islamic
fundamentalist organisations including Osama
bin Laden's al Qaeda. The Republicans wanted at the time to
undermine the Clinton Administration. However,
at a time when the entire country had its eyes
riveted on the Monica Lewinsky scandal, the
Republicans no doubt chose not to trigger an
untimely "Iran-Bosniagate" affair, which might
have unduly diverted public attention away from
the Lewinsky scandal. The Republicans wanted
to impeach Bill Clinton "for having lied to the
American People" regarding his affair with White
House intern Monica Lewinsky. On the more
substantive "foreign policy lies" regarding drug
running and covert operations in the Balkans,
Democrats and Republicans agreed in unison,
no doubt pressured by the Pentagon and the
CIA not to "spill the beans". From Bosnia to Kosovo The "Bosnian pattern" described in the 1997
Congressional RPC report was replicated in
Kosovo. With the complicity of NATO and the US
State Department. Mujahideen mercenaries
from the Middle East and Central Asia were
recruited to fight in the ranks of the Kosovo
Liberation Army (KLA) in 1998-99, largely
supporting NATO's war effort. Confirmed by British military sources, the task of
arming and training of the KLA had been
entrusted in 1998 to the US Defence
Intelligence Agency (DIA) and Britain's Secret
Intelligence Services MI6, together with "former
and serving members of 22 SAS [Britain's 22nd
Special Air Services Regiment], as well as three
British and American private security
companies".7
The US DIA approached MI6 to arrange a
training programme for the KLA, said a senior
British military source. `MI6 then sub-contracted
the operation to two British security companies,
who in turn approached a number of former
members of the (22 SAS) regiment. Lists were
then drawn up of weapons and equipment
needed by the KLA.' While these covert
operations were continuing, serving members
of 22 SAS Regiment, mostly from the unit's D
Squadron, were first deployed in Kosovo before
the beginning of the bombing campaign in
March. 8
While British SAS Special Forces in bases in
Northern Albania were training the KLA, military
instructors from Turkey and Afghanistan
financed by the "Islamic jihad" were
collaborating in training the KLA in guerilla and
diversion tactics.9:
Bin Laden had visited Albania himself. He was
one of several fundamentalist groups that had
sent units to fight in Kosovo, ... Bin Laden is
believed to have established an operation in
Albania in 1994 ... Albanian sources say Sali
Berisha, who was then president, had links with
some groups that later proved to be extreme
fundamentalists. 10
Congressional Testimonies on KLA-Osama
links According to Frank Ciluffo of the Globalized
Organised Crime Program, in a testimony
presented to the House of Representatives
Judicial Committee:
What was largely hidden from public view was
the fact that the KLA raise part of their funds
from the sale of narcotics. Albania and Kosovo
lie at the heart of the "Balkan Route" that links
the "Golden Crescent" of Afghanistan and
Pakistan to the drug markets of Europe. This
route is worth an estimated $400 billion a year
and handles 80 percent of heroin destined for
Europe. 11
According to Ralf Mutschke of Interpol's Criminal
Intelligence division also in a testimony to the
House Judicial Committee:
The U.S. State Department listed the KLA as a
terrorist organization, indicating that it was
financing its operations with money from the
international heroin trade and loans from
Islamic countries and individuals, among them
allegedly Usama bin Laden" . Another link to bin
Laden is the fact that the brother of a leader in
an Egyptian Jihad organization and also a
military commander of Usama bin Laden, was
leading an elite KLA unit during the Kosovo
conflict. 12
Madeleine Albright Covets the KLA These KLA links to international terrorism and
organised crime documented by the US
Congress were totally ignored by the Clinton
Administration. In fact, in the months preceding
the bombing of Yugoslavia, Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright was busy building a "political
legitimacy" for the KLA. The paramilitary army
had --from one day to the next-- been elevated to
the status of a bona fide "democratic" force in
Kosovo. In turn, Madeleine Albright has forced
the pace of international diplomacy: the KLA had
been spearheaded into playing a central role in
the failed "peace negotiations" at Rambouiillet
in early 1999. The Senate and the House tacitly endorse State
Terrorism While the various Congressional reports
confirmed that the US government had been
working hand in glove with Osama bin Laden's
Al Qaeda, this did not prevent the Clinton and
later the Bush Administration from arming and
equipping the KLA. The Congressional
documents also confirm that members of the
Senate and the House knew the relationship of
the Administration to international terrorism. To
quote the statement of Rep. John Kasich of the
House Armed Services Committee: "We
connected ourselves [in 1998-99] with the KLA,
which was the staging point for bin Laden..." 13 In the wake of the tragic events of September
11, Republicans and Democrats in unison have
given their full support to the President to "wage
war on Osama". In 1999, Senator Jo Lieberman had stated
authoritatively that "Fighting for the KLA is
fighting for human rights and American values."
In the hours following the October 7 missile
attacks on Afghanistan, the same Jo Lieberman
called for punitive air strikes against Iraq: "We're
in a war against terrorism... We can't stop with
bin Laden and the Taliban." Yet Senator Jo
Lieberman, as member of the Armed Services
Committee of the Senate had access to all the
Congressional documents pertaining to
"KLA-Osama" links. In making this statement,
he was fully aware that that agencies of the US
government as well as NATO were supporting
international terrorism. The War in Macedonia In the wake of the 1999 war in Yugoslavia, the
terrorist activities of the KLA were extended into
Southern Serbia and Macedonia. Meanwhile,
the KLA --renamed the Kosovo Protection Corps
(KPC)-- was elevated to United Nations status,
implying the granting of "legitimate" sources of
funding through United Nations as well as
through bilateral channels, including direct US
military aid. And barely two months after the official
inauguration of the KPC under UN auspices
(September 1999), KPC-KLA commanders -
using UN resources and equipment - were
already preparing the assaults into Macedonia,
as a logical follow-up to their terrorist activities
in Kosovo. According to the Skopje daily
Dnevnik, the KPC had established a "sixth
operation zone" in Southern Serbia and
Macedonia:
Sources, who insist on anonymity, claim that the
headquarters of the Kosovo protection brigades
[i.e. linked to the UN sponsored KPC] have
[March 2000] already been formed in Tetovo,
Gostivar and Skopje. They are being prepared in
Debar and Struga [on the border with Albania]
as well, and their members have defined codes.
14
According to the BBC, "Western special forces
were still training the guerrillas" meaning that
they were assisting the KLA in opening up "a
sixth operation zone" in Southern Serbia and
Macedonia. 15 "The Islamic Militant Network" and NATO join
hands in Macedonia Among the foreign mercenaries now fighting in
Macedonia (October 2001) in the ranks of
self-proclaimed National Liberation Army (NLA),
are Mujahideen from the Middle East and the
Central Asian republics of the former Soviet
Union. Also within the KLA's proxy force in
Macedonia are senior US military advisers from
a private mercenary outfit on contract to the
Pentagon as well as "soldiers of fortune" from
Britain, Holland and Germany. Some of these
Western mercenaries had previously fought with
the KLA and the Bosnian Muslim Army. 16 Extensively documented by the Macedonian
press and statements of the Macedonian
authorities, the US government and the "Islamic
Militant Network" are working hand in glove in
supporting and financing the self-proclaimed
National Liberation Army (NLA), involved in the
terrorist attacks in Macedonia. The NLA is a
proxy of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). In
turn the KLA and the UN sponsored Kosovo
Protection Corps (KPC) are identical institutions
with the same commanders and military
personnel. KPC Commanders on UN salaries
are fighting in the NLA together with the
Mujahideen. In a bitter twist, while supported and financed by
Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda, the KLA-NLA is
also supported by NATO and the United Nations
mission to Kosovo (UNMIK). In fact, the "Islamic
Militant Network" --also using Pakistan's Inter
Service Intelligence (ISI) as the CIA's
go-between-- still constitutes an integral part of
Washington's covert military-intelligence
operations in Macedonia and Southern Serbia. The KLA-NLA terrorists are funded from US
military aid, the United Nations peace-keeping
budget as well as by several Islamic
organisations including Osama bin Laden's Al
Qaeda. Drug money is also being used to
finance the terrorists with the complicity of the
US government. The recruitment of Mujahideen
to fight in the ranks of the NLA in Macedonia is
implemented through various Islamic groups. US military advisers mingle with Mujahideen
within the same paramilitary force, Western
mercenaries from NATO countries fight
alongside Mujahideen recruited in the Middle
East and Central Asia. And the US media calls
this a "blowback" where so-called "intelligence
assets" have gone against their sponsors! But this did not happen during the Cold war! It is
happening right now in Macedonia. And it is
confirmed by numerous press reports,
eyewitness accounts, photographic evidence as
well as official statements by the Macedonian
Prime Minister, who has accused the Western
military alliance of supporting the terrorists.
Moreover, the official Macedonian New Agency
(MIA) has pointed to the complicity between
Washington's envoy Ambassador James
Pardew and the NLA terrorists. 17 In other
words, the so-called "intelligence assets" are
still serving the interests of their US sponsors. Pardew's background is revealing in this regard.
He started his Balkans career in 1993 as a
senior intelligence officer for the Joint Chiefs of
Staff responsible for channeling US aid to the
Bosnian Muslim Army. Coronel Pardew had
been put in charge of arranging the "air-drops"
of supplies to Bosnian forces. At the time, these
"air drops" were tagged as "civilian aid". It later
transpired --confirmed by the RPC
Congressional report-- that the US had violated
the arms embargo. And James Pardew played
an important role as part of the team of
intelligence officials working closely with the
Chairman of the National Security Council
Anthony Lake. Pardew was later involved in the Dayton
negotiations (1995) on behalf of the US Defence
Department. In 1999, prior to the bombing of
Yugoslavia, he was appointed "Special
Representative for Military Stabilisation and
Kosovo Implementation" by President Clinton.
One of his tasks was to channel support to the
Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), which at the time
was also being supported by Osama bin Laden.
Pardew was in this regard instrumental in
replicating the "Bosnian pattern" in Kosovo and
subsequently in Macedonia... Justification for Waging War The Bush Administration has stated that it has
proof that Osama bin Laden is behind the
attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon. In the
words of British Prime Minister Tony Blair: "I
have seen absolutely powerful and
incontrovertible evidence of his [Osama] link to
the events of the 11th of September." 18 What
Tony Blair fails to mention is that agencies of
the US government including the CIA continue to
"harbor" Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda. A major war supposedly "against international
terrorism" has been launched by a government
which is harboring international terrorism as
part of its foreign policy agenda. In other words,
the main justification for waging war has been
totally fabricated. The American people have
been deliberately and consciously misled by
their government into supporting a major
military adventure which affects our collective
future. This decision to mislead the American people
was taken barely a few hours after the terrorist
attacks on the World Trade Centre. Without
supporting evidence, Osama had already been
tagged as the "prime suspect." Two days later
on Thursday the 13th of September --while the
FBI investigations had barely commenced--
President Bush pledged to "lead the world to
victory". The Administration confirmed its
intention to embark on "a sustained military
campaign rather than a single dramatic action"
directed against Osama bin Laden. 19 In
addition to Afghanistan, a number of countries
in the Middle East were mentioned as possible
targets including Iraq, Iran, Libya and the Sudan.
And several prominent US political figures and
media pundits have demanded that the air
strikes be extended to other countries "which
harbour international terrorism." According to
intelligence sources, Osama bin Laden's al
Qaeda has operations in some 50 to 60
countries providing ample pretext to intervene in
several "rogue states" in the Middle East and
Central Asia. Moreover, the entire US Legislature --with only
one honest and courageous dissenting voice in
the House of Representatives-- has tacitly
endorsed the Administration's decision to go
war. Members of the House and the Senate
have access through the various committees to
official confidential reports and intelligence
documents which prove beyond doubt that
agencies of the US government have ties to
international terrorism. They cannot say "we did
not know". In fact, most of this evidence is in the
public domain. Under the historical resolution of the US
Congress adopted by both the House and the
Senate on the 14th of September:
The president is authorized to use all necessary
and appropriate force against those nations,
organizations, or persons he determines
planned, authorized, committed, or aided the
terrorist attacks that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001,
or harbored such organizations or persons, in
order to prevent any future acts of international
terrorism against the United States by such
nations, organizations or persons.
Whereas there is no evidence that agencies of
the US government "aided the terrorist attacks"
on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon,
there is ample and detailed evidence that
agencies of the US government as well as
NATO, have since the end of the Cold War
continued to "harbor such organizations". Patriotism cannot be based on a falsehood,
particularly when it constitutes a pretext for
waging war and killing innocent civilians. Ironically, the text of the Congressional
resolution also constitutes a "blowback" against
the US sponsors of international terrorism. The
resolution does not exclude the conduct of an
"Osamagate" inquiry, as well as appropriate
actions against agencies and/or individuals of
the US government, who may have collaborated
with Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda. And the
evidence indelibly points directly to the Bush
Administration.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------Notes
1. United Press International (UPI), 15
September 2001. 2. The Guardian, London, 15 September 2001. 3. UPI, op cit, 4. For further details see Michel Chossudovsky,
Who is Osama bin Laden, Centre for Research
on Globalisation, 12 September 2001,
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html. 5. International Media Corporation Defense and
Strategy Policy, US Commits Forces, Weapons
to Bosnia, London, 31 October 1994. 6. Congressional Press Release, Republican
Party Committee (RPC), US Congress,
Clinton-Approved Iranian Arms Transfers Help
Turn Bosnia into Militant Islamic Base, 16
January 1997, available on the website of the
Centre of Research on Globalisation (CRG) at
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/DCH109A.html.
The original document is on the website of the
US Senate Republican Party Committee
(Senator Larry Craig), at
http://www.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1997/iran.h
tm) 7. The Scotsman, Glasgow, 29 August 1999. 8. Ibid. 9. Truth in Media, Kosovo in Crisis, Phoenix,
Arizona, 2 April 1999 10. Sunday Times, London, 29 November 1998. 11. US Congress, Testimony of Frank J. Cilluffo
, Deputy Director, Global Organized Crime,
Program director to the House Judiciary
Committee, 13 December 2000. 12. US Congress, Testimony of Ralf Mutschke
of Interpol's Criminal Intelligence Division, to the
House Judicial Committee, 13 December 2000. 13. US Congress, Transcripts of the House
Armed Services Committee, 5 October 1999, 14. Macedonian Information Centre Newsletter,
Skopje, 21 March 2000, published by BBC
Summary of World Broadcast, 24 March 2000. 15. BBC, 29 January 2001, at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/ne
wsid_1142000/1142478.stm) 16. Scotland on Sunday, Glasgow, 15 June
2001 at
http://www.scotlandonsunday.com/text_only.cfm
?id=SS01025960, see also UPI, 9 July 2001.
For further details see Michel Chossudovsky,
Washington behind Terrorist Assaults in
Macedonia, Centre for Research on
Globalisation, August 2001, at
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO108B.html.
) 17. Macedonian Information Agency (MIA), 26
September 2001, available at the Centre for
Research on Globalisation at
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MNA110A.html 18. Quoted in The Daily Telegraph, London, 1
October 2001. 19. Statement by official following the speech by
President George Bush on 14 September 2001
quoted in the International Herald Tribune,
Paris, 14 September 2001. -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------The URL of this article is:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO110A.html Copyright, Michel Chossudovsky, Centre for
Research on Globalisation (CRG), October
2001. All rights reserved. Permission is granted
to post this text on non-commercial community
internet sites, provided the source and the URL
are indicated, the essay remains intact and the
copyright note is displayed. To publish this text
in printed and/or other forms, including
commercial Internet sites and excerpts, contact
the Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG)
at [email protected], fax
1-514-4256224.
