In Listening to the "defense" of Trump offered by Jim Jordan et al.
I'm reminded of this gem from Sam Harris:
"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?"
And I wonder if Pat and Marc view the indictments as being politically motivated?
Peter T.
I'm reminded of this gem from Sam Harris:
"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?"
And I wonder if Pat and Marc view the indictments as being politically motivated?
Peter T.
