I'm buried in snow here so I'm heading out to operate the snow blower for a considerable amount of time. So, this will be just a brief response to the website you posted "here is the evidence" which I looked at a bit last night. 

Now, I randomly sampled about a dozen of their items, so I admit I did not go through all of them. I went to ones that on their rating system they seemed to feel were important. It was not good at all as every one had a link to look at and every link showed no evidence whatsoever. Not only that multiple links went to the Epoch Times, a fictional newspaper, that is entirely propaganda and wacked out conspiracy theories. Another link went to Judicial Watch, another organization that is well known for promoting conspiracy theories and false information and that lunatic Joe DiGenova has been involved with. In fact the link was for a press release for a fake lawsuit they file over and over (they have done it for years) in states where they claim there are more registered voters than there are residents in the towns in whatever state they choose to file it in. These suits are always shown to be a propaganda scam that they use to create a news story that places like FOX can report on but of course they always are proven false and fail or are dropped because Judicial Watch never can provide evidence of their claim...sound familiar?

If there is an item there that you think is particularly interesting and you think I should look at let me know and I will look at it. I sampled several things, including a video about registering homeless people to vote at 201 Washington Street in Georgia and a statement on statistics from a math professor right here in Massachusetts, as well as the Epoch Times and Judicial Watch stuff. 

I know I am just a guy on the internet, but you have interacted with me for a while and I would not just make something up to bullshit you. I would say based on what I looked at that website is a scam and propaganda site meant to stir up controversy and trouble by spreading false information. 

I don't expect you to take my word for it though, so I understand if you want to look at what I am saying with some skepticism, that's fine, but I would say you should take another look at what that site is claiming to present. Not for my benefit but for your own benefit as I can say what I saw there was definitely not evidence and certainly appeared designed to fool people. 

I do honestly appreciate you pointing it out to me though because I had not seen it and I have been very curious as to what people are looking at and claiming they believe is evidence. I get pretty sick of guys like Rudy who come out and make wild claims and then show no evidence of their claims. 

I address the other stuff after I dig out of this snow storm.