Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Yes, that video is not bad. She actually could have piled in some more
items that show the Clintons media control. I did like the compilation of
clips at the start of all the people giving the approved "But that was
exposed by the Russians so we should ignore it." line of crap. Yes, the Clintons are well connected, money and power mad, and have a
giant and powerful support group for their ambitions.It comes with the territory that if you somehow got rid of the Clintons
you still have people like the Podestas lurking who likely would just
move on to the next potential president. Here's the thing you have to understand though, Cyan, at the moment the
only shot to get rid of the Clintons is actually to elect them. I know
that stinks, and I don't like it either. It is a horrendous thing to hand
over the keys to the presidency to people like Trump or the Clintons
but...these are the choices. Nobody is riding in on a white horse to rescue us from these assholes. At least the Clintons have left an amazing trail of corruption that
maybe...just maybe...somebody will be able to prosecute. So, electing her
puts them in the spotlight and the Republicans will set the dogs on them
the minute they step foot in the White House. If they can find the key to impeaching her, which looks like it could be
there with the Clinton Foundation, then electing her is the way to go. Sure, that stooge Kaine will just pardon them but that would be the end
for the Clintons...which needs to happen to get the Democrats to move
back toward being Democrats.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
Reg
(view)
Yes, that video is not bad. She actually could have piled in some more
items that show the Clintons media control. I did like the compilation of
clips at the start of all the people giving the approved "But that was
exposed by the Russians so we should ignore it." line of crap. Yes, the Clintons are well connected, money and power mad, and have a
giant and powerful support group for their ambitions.It comes with the territory that if you somehow got rid of the Clintons
you still have people like the Podestas lurking who likely would just
move on to the next potential president. Here's the thing you have to understand though, Cyan, at the moment the
only shot to get rid of the Clintons is actually to elect them. I know
that stinks, and I don't like it either. It is a horrendous thing to hand
over the keys to the presidency to people like Trump or the Clintons
but...these are the choices. Nobody is riding in on a white horse to rescue us from these assholes. At least the Clintons have left an amazing trail of corruption that
maybe...just maybe...somebody will be able to prosecute. So, electing her
puts them in the spotlight and the Republicans will set the dogs on them
the minute they step foot in the White House. If they can find the key to impeaching her, which looks like it could be
there with the Clinton Foundation, then electing her is the way to go. Sure, that stooge Kaine will just pardon them but that would be the end
for the Clintons...which needs to happen to get the Democrats to move
back toward being Democrats.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
posted 2016.11.06
posted on November 6th 2016
Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
Trump = Chaos which is why the Kremlin loves him – Reg on November 5th, 2016-
Re: Trump = Chaos which is why the Kremlin loves him – cyanaura on November 6th, 2016-
Re: Trump = Chaos which is why the Kremlin loves him – Reg on November 6th, 2016-
Seriously Reg? That is your logic? – Marc on November 9th, 2016-
Re: Seriously Reg? That is your logic? – Reg on November 10th, 2016-
Re: Seriously Reg? That is your logic? – Marc on November 10th, 2016-
Re: Seriously Reg? That is your logic? – Dslacker on November 11th, 2016-
Re: Seriously Reg? That is your logic? – Marc on November 12th, 2016
Re: Seriously Reg? That is your logic? – Marc on November 12th, 2016
Sadly, I think everybody lost... – Reg on November 11th, 2016
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
