rosskolnikov
location: Far end of the Group W bench
listening to: The Tony Rice Unit
registered: 2005.05.24
posts: 1822
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
This one, as with "Under the Banner of Heaven," is less about Krakauer than is subject. He certainly
gets his viewpoint across in a few spots, but there aren't lengthy digressions into his own past as
found in "Into Thin Air" or "Into the Wild." I say it's worth a read. It's pretty clear in the book (and from most other sources on the subject now)
that the military lied about Tillman's demise, knew it was lying about his demise, and used its initial
statements to score political points that it really didn't need to score at the time. Someone should
have been court-martialed.
–--
.:RS:.
.:RS:.
R
rosskolnikov
(view)
This one, as with "Under the Banner of Heaven," is less about Krakauer than is subject. He certainly
gets his viewpoint across in a few spots, but there aren't lengthy digressions into his own past as
found in "Into Thin Air" or "Into the Wild." I say it's worth a read. It's pretty clear in the book (and from most other sources on the subject now)
that the military lied about Tillman's demise, knew it was lying about his demise, and used its initial
statements to score political points that it really didn't need to score at the time. Someone should
have been court-martialed.
–--
.:RS:.
.:RS:.
