Reg said:

1. When they talk to Alex Jones about David Icke, he refers to Icke as "a con man" and on Icke's theories he says "they are like a turd in the punch bowl". Jones says he believes there are only a few ways to go on Mr. Icke, that he's completely nuts, that he's working for those behind the global "New World Order" conspiracy to discredit guys like Jones, or he's a con man who knows what he's doing and is just trying to make a buck. For the record Jones states he believes most in the last idea. I wondered what you thought about this and who's take on things you prefer, Jones or Icke.

Well, I can't claim to speak for anyone else, and certainly not for KDB (peace and prayers), but here are my observations:

Alex Jones has a much sexier website, with far more information glowing at you than you could ever take in.  It is as though we are treated to a gushing firehose of otherworldly theories as to . . . everything.

But David Icke maintains a much more streamlined approach, keeping himself firmly in the spotlight of whatever alleged "news" he claims to deliver.

I'm not sure which one I would recommend over the other with regards to claims about how the world is run, overrun, or badly run, but I can at least say that these two gentlemen deserve to sit right up there with our own KDB.

I do not think that either site trumps CNN, FOXNEWS, or MSNBC in the arena of "bad journalism."  In an era of terrifically bad reporting, sites like those of Jones and Icke are just icing on a very sad cake.

Herring405