GM— I’m sure you must be aware at this point, but this message board is part of the David Baerwald InfoSource, and is not the Global Warming InfoSource. Your frequent attempts to revisit this topic are curious, since the topic of Global Climate Change most often does not get raised until you submit one of your poorly formatted posts (in this case, an entire smorgasbord of naysayers of various degrees of accreditation, along with a few Cleveland TV personalities, complete with no links to the source articles in all but 2 instances). The fact that you continue to focus on “Warming”, rather than “Climate Change” is also interesting. I only hear the nay-sayers call it “Warming”, while those who look for change are looking at the entire picture of “Climate Change”.

If you really believe the first sentence of your post—“ I continue to maintain genetic engineering and water pollution are far more dire problems.”—I would suggest that you focus your energies there, rather than continuing to rail against a topic that you don’t think is important. When you load up a single post with so much unreadable information, most readers here will ignore it. I won’t go so far as to say you’re preaching to deaf ears on this board, but the way you present your information makes it incredibly difficult to process. And I’ll continue to say, as I’ve said all along on this topic, that whether or not humans are having an impact on climate change, we should be taking better care of our home, and most of the mitigation techniques associated with Kyoto, or really any other climate change proposals, are parts of responsible stewardship of our planet. Making sure we have clean air, clean water, healthy foods, and renewable energy all factor into this, and all will definitely have an impact on the human race’s ability to survive on this planet, with or without climate change.