Reg:

You made a very provocative statement when you informed all who gather here that:

> my brother has been jailed for 60 days for a traffic > violation. He has been informed that they will take a > DNA sample before he is released. my brother has been jailed for 60 days for a traffic > violation. He has been informed that they will take a > DNA sample before he is released. my brother has been jailed for 60 days for a traffic > violation. He has been informed that they will take a > DNA sample before he is released. violation. He has been informed that they will take a > DNA sample before he is released. violation. He has been informed that they will take a > DNA sample before he is released. DNA sample before he is released. DNA sample before he is released.

Well, if you don't mind me asking --- what was the violation?

If it was him going 56 in a 55 MPH zone, then that would be outrageous to say the least. However, if the matter is more like a repeat offense, let's say, the fifth time he was stopped for a DUI, then 60 days would not seem so unreasonable, given the seriousness of that infraction.

Obviously, no one here knows your brother (I believe this is true), so what would be the harm in you providing more background to what has had many around here scratching their heads during the past day or so?

I don't think there can no longer be any doubt that the police all over the USA have been militarized to a great degree --- this is explicitly shown in the three-part POLICE STATE documentary series by Alex Jones. This is the real reason for the FEMA URBAN WARFARE EXERCISES during the past ten years --- as they work to remove the 1875 POSSE COMITATUS ACT --- a federal law where it is forbidden to use the federal militia as a domestic police force.

So Reg, how about it?

What did your brother do that warranted sixty days in the hole?

Just wondering, that's all . . .

Peace and Prayers,

Kent Daniel Bentkowski Buffalo, New York USA