Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
I won't spin. I don't think Obama is a terrorist or has any ties to them but that"s not what matters here. What matters is he is on the wrong side of the wrong people. I posted this already but I'll say it again in a different way. If you like Obama, and I do, you should be aware of this.
1. There is a core group of Democrats that feel he is unelectable. Yes, the Clintons lead this gang but there are plenty of well placed Democrats that feel the same. This is why the "party elders" are not stepping in to unite the party around one candidate. They will let the attacks on Obama continue and they are hoping they work.
2. He's not exactly a Big Energy, Military Industrial Complex approved candidate. In fact, some people who think about these things might feel that one of the reasons he keeps getting donations from people in these industries is because they feel he is a guaranteed loser. That would be speculation of course.
3. The AIPAC crowd can't stand him and never could. There is no better oiled attack, smear, and destroy machine out there. These guys working with the Clintons could make Mother Teresa look like Adolph Hitler. In the United States, according to Richard Perle, you can't get elected unless you are AIPAC approved.
So, no spin, Dale, you are probably 100% correct but it is a sad thing to be correct about I think.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
Reg
(view)
I won't spin. I don't think Obama is a terrorist or has any ties to them but that"s not what matters here. What matters is he is on the wrong side of the wrong people. I posted this already but I'll say it again in a different way. If you like Obama, and I do, you should be aware of this.
1. There is a core group of Democrats that feel he is unelectable. Yes, the Clintons lead this gang but there are plenty of well placed Democrats that feel the same. This is why the "party elders" are not stepping in to unite the party around one candidate. They will let the attacks on Obama continue and they are hoping they work.
2. He's not exactly a Big Energy, Military Industrial Complex approved candidate. In fact, some people who think about these things might feel that one of the reasons he keeps getting donations from people in these industries is because they feel he is a guaranteed loser. That would be speculation of course.
3. The AIPAC crowd can't stand him and never could. There is no better oiled attack, smear, and destroy machine out there. These guys working with the Clintons could make Mother Teresa look like Adolph Hitler. In the United States, according to Richard Perle, you can't get elected unless you are AIPAC approved.
So, no spin, Dale, you are probably 100% correct but it is a sad thing to be correct about I think.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
posted 2008.04.24
posted on April 24th 2008
Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
Another small cut for Obama... – dale on April 24th, 2008-
The No Spin Zone – Reg on April 24th, 2008-
Re: The No Spin Zone – dale on April 24th, 2008-
An Editorial From That Site – Baerwald on April 24th, 2008-
Re: An Editorial From That Site (UPDATED) – dale on April 24th, 2008-
Re: An Editorial From That Site (UPDATED) – Baerwald on April 24th, 2008-
Yeah, and here's another... – edlorah on April 24th, 2008
-
-
-
-
-
-
