I've got no problem with conspiracy theories but this is one that just does not work for me. I don't buy that stuff about a "bloodline" deciding a president and why the hell would Hillary Clinton serve these "people" and meet their agenda any better than Mitt Romney...who is obviously the best choice to follow and expand upon the neo-con agenda. Sure, Hillary is a major monkey wrench in the works for the Democrats and I think she is who the Republicans would like to run against (as is Obama) but "handed the presidency"...why and to what end? If they just want to go about their business and do what they are doing and create a world government of Big Oil and Military Industrial Complex CEO's and snakes...why the hell would they not hand it to Romney the guy that would gladly participate and give them a huge leg up?

Bottom line is, why do they benefit most from Clinton?

That's the part I can't piece together. I mean with 9/11 or Kennedy conspiracy stuff you can draw a direct line to who benefits the most...with Clinton it's all scribbling on the page...so please anybody who buys the idea they are going to give Hillary the presidency please jump in and clear this up for me.

Is she a strong candidate? Sure, Bill Clinton in her corner, a lot of money behind her, a woman running for president, part of the long running Clinton soap opera, the media eats it all up with a spoon regardless of the fact that it's sugar coated shit...so they do endless stories on her and give her countless headlines...so yeah, it's easy to see why she would be a favorite but this does not mean they want to "give her the presidency"...