This matches the context of the American reality of the past 100 years in particular. Be well ...

SOCIOCRATS ARE NOT ELITE OR LIBERAL

Erica Carle November 1, 2006 NewsWithViews.com

My dictionary says “elite” means the group or part of a group selected or regarded as the best, finest, most distinguished, and most powerful. I submit that members of the new world order or world government clique should not be characterized by such a complimentary term. Many of them are or have been extremely wealthy. Some may be attractive. Others may be in personable and popular. Quite a few hold high political office. A good many are born to comfort and privilege There may even be a few among them who are IQ gifted, but in no way can they be regarded as the best, finest, most distinguished and most powerful.

Those who wish to establish a new world order to destroy our national sovereignty and independence are merely followers of a destructive concept that has become the dominating idea controlling their minds and their lives. They are group dependent. They are not truth seekers or independent thinkers. They are weak charactered subservient followers who need to be involved in group goals to give them identity. They are cowards who dare not face the future unless it is totally planned and systematized. And they are bullies who gang up to tear down whatever is not according to the concept that controls them. In government they are untrustworthy workers who use any advantages to work against those they are supposed to serve. Elite does NOT define them.

Nor is “liberal” a good description. There is nothing liberal about forcing everyone into a worldwide management system that deprives individuals of the ability to make constructive choices in matters directly affecting their own lives. There is nothing liberal about requiring that all decisions be considered to be group decisions. There is nothing liberal about schooling little children in group conformity rather than training them in self control and teaching them a love of virtue and truth.

The world shapers are neither elite nor liberal, but they are united in a common purpose. There should be an accurate and understandable term to define their goals and identify the promoters and participants.

Fortunately there is no need to make up a term or coin a word. That was done more than a century and one half ago by Auguste Comte. Comte (1798-1857) was a French mathematician/ philosopher who devoted his entire intellectual life to developing plans for a system of world unity and control. He called his world system a SOCIOCRACY. Those who supported his philosophy or worked with him to promote controlled unity he called SOCIOCRATS.

Sociocracy has its own religion which Comte called SOCIOLATRY, POSITIVISM, or the RELIGION OF HUMANITY. The object of worship is SOCIETY conceived of as a collective female entity. In SOCIOLATRY, and religions based on sociolatry, there is but one sin--separation. Separation is the only sin.

Comte declared that studying social behavior in order to combine, classify, claim, and control life on earth was to become a science which he called SOCIOLOGY or SOCIAL SCIENCE. Comte considered sociology to be necessary as the systematic base for sociocracy and sociolatry. According to his planning SOCIOLOGISTS were gradually to become the intellectual monitors, political planners, economic regulators, spiritual leaders, and moral teachers of a sociocratic world system.

In his System of Positive Polity Comte wrote:

1. The only real life is the collective life of the race; individual life has no existence except as an abstraction. SPP, Vol. I, P202

2. When the system is fully regulated, the effect of this will be to secure greater unity by diminishing the influence of personal character. SPP, Vol. II, P. 237

3. The requisite convergence of the best minds cannot be obtained without voluntary renunciation on the part of most of them, of their sovereign right to free inquiry. Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, Translated by Harriet Martineau, George Bell, London, 1896, Vol. II., P. 170.

Now, after more than 150 years sociocracy has progressed to a remarkable extent. Sociocrats are found in every country, in every race, in every social or economic grouping, every occupation or profession, in every religion and political party, in every school or college, and among those who call themselves liberal and also those who call themselves conservative.

Sociocrats seek control of emotion, thought, and action. They make decisions according to plan, play on the emotions of groups, propose legislation, and then take action to enforce their decisions. If they cannot get legislators to vote in their favor, they use judges to rule in their favor. Flattery, bribery and deceit are among their methods. If these do not succeed sociocrats are more than willing to use violence.

Have you ever tried to say NO to a sociocrat? NO, I do not want my child sent across town to another school. No, I do not want my child to have sex education in school. NO I do not want government drug education. NO, I do not want government medicine. NO, I do not want the government to form partnerships with selected businesses. NO, I do not want the use of my property to be limited by snakes and beetles. NO I do not want to be forced to believe or have my child taught that all people must be equal. No, I do not want to be told who I must hire and who I may fire. NO, I do not want my money to be given to strangers without my permission. NO, NO, NO---all to no avail.

Have you ever gone to a city council meeting, state legislature or congress to testify about proposed legislation? If one of the first questions you are asked is: “Who do you represent?” you know that sociocrats are in charge. Unless you claim to represent an activist group, you will be among the last to testify and what you have to say will be ignored. You, as an individual, are insignificant. No matter how true, sensible, or enlightened your testimony--to sociocrats you are a nonentity. The father of sociology intended to keep you from independent thinking and influence . He wrote:

4. We must get rid of personality in every shape, even of the personality of an imaginary being, if we would found a powerful and enduring discipline in the name of humanity. SPP, Vol.IV.249.

Elite and liberal are meaningless to most people. but the term “sociocrat” defines and identifies world government advocates. It puts all who believe in or support sociocracy into a single identifiable category. Whether they be financial supporters, teachers, workers, corporate managers, women, entertainers, elected officials, bureaucrats, media personalities, scientists, physicians, nurses--whenever; if they believe in, or act to promote the sociocratic new world order, they are sociocrats.

One does not have to be above the average in intelligence to be at the upper levels of the sociocratic hierarchy . The basic outlines of the entire plan were laid out by Comte 150 years ago, and the plan is still being followed. Comte’s writings provide detailed recipes for gaining control.

The most important sociocratic characteristics are not intelligence and character, but obedience and emotional vulnerability. According to Comte,

5. It is the primary condition of social reorganization to put an end to the state of utter revolt which the Intellect maintains against the Heart . . . Positivism has at last overcome the immense difficulties of this task. . . every part of our nature is brought under the regenerating influence of the worship of Humanity.” SPP, Vol. I, P285.

6. No one knows so well as the Positivist that the principal source of real morality lies in direct exercise of our social sympathies, whether systematic or spontaneous. He will spare no efforts to develope these sympathies from the earliest years by every method which sound philosophy can indicate. It is in this that moral education, whether private or public principally consists; and to it mental education is always to be held subordinate. SPP, Vol. I. P. 80.

7. Education thus will from the beginning have its goal marked out for it, and will thus never be wasted in useless academic studies. SPP, Vol. II., P. 299.

At present curriculum in public schools is in the hands of sociocratic organizations. Local school boards have little or nothing to say about what is being taught. The sociocrats and sociologists are in charge. Your children and grandchildren are in their hands. They are being taught the religion of sociolatry and obedience to the vast worldwide sociocracy.

How can we call sociocrats elite and liberal when they are no such thing? When informed writers, researchers teachers, and citizens use Comte’s terms “sociocrat,” “sociocracy,” “sociolatry,” and “sociology” when referring to the new world order promoters and its religion, rather than “elite” or “liberal,” larger numbers of people will understand what is intended, and be willing to learn what ought to be done to restore intelligence and character to our public and private lives.

© 2006 Erica Carle - All Rights Reserved