..... the legislation to create a Homeland Security
Department to defend the nation against
terrorism was graced with a number of strange
amendments. Oddest among them was an amendment
protecting the pharmaceutical corporate giant
Eli Lilly from any and all lawsuits pertaining to
their manufacture of thimersol, a mercury-based
preservative for childhood vaccines produced by
Lilly for 40 years that has been connected to the
development of autism in children. Thousands
of families seeking redress for the neurological
disorders their children suffer have been sent
packing, because Lilly has a contract with the
U.S. government to provide vaccines against
biological weapons. One hopes thimersol is not
included in the processing this time around. Early in 2002, Bill Frist tried to get protection for
Eli Lilly from these suits attached to legislation
that would increase the availability of vaccines to
average Americans, but this attempt was
thwarted by Senator Edward Kennedy. The
Homeland Security legislation mysteriously
found itself amended to carry the Lilly litigation
protections, written in language virtually identical
to Frist's original attempt. The bill passed, and
no one in Washington DC is willing to take
responsibility for it. Frist, whose ties to the
corporate healthcare industry are blood ties,
whose family made its fortune through the
massive Hospital Corporation of America HMO,
who helped scuttle the Patient's Bill of Rights,
whose book was promoted and distributed
vigorously by Eli Lilly, denies all knowledge. The White House likewise denies any
knowledge of the author/sponsor of the Lilly
amendment. This stretches belief, considering
the ties the Bush administration has to the
pharmaceutical giant. George Herbert Walker
Bush sat on the Lilly Board of Directors during
the late 1970s, appointed by the father of Bush
Sr's. vice presidential candidate, Dan Quayle,
who owned controlling interest in the
corporation. Bush Sr. was personally ordered by
the Supreme Court to stop lobbying the IRS on
behalf of Lilly for tax breaks in 1982. The Bush
family has been substantially invested in Eli Lilly
stock for years. White House Budget Director Mitchell Daniels is
a former Lilly executive. Disgraced Enron CEO
Kenneth Lay also sat on the Lilly Board of
Directors, until he was forced to resign in
disgrace in December of 2001 after his
company exploded in a blizzard of fraud and
deceit. During the 2002 election cycle, Eli Lilly
gave more campaign money - $1.6 million -
than any other pharmaceutical corporation, 79%
of which went to Republican candidates. The
Lilly amendment that found its way into the
Homeland Security bill in the immediate
aftermath of that election can be seen for what it
is: a payoff. These are facts in the public record as we roar
into the brave new world of 2003. These are
facts that the mainstream television media will
not share with you; understand that NBC and
MSNBC, for one example, are owned by General
Electric, one of the largest defense contractors
on earth. General Electric stands to make
incredible profit from a war with Iraq, despite the
fact that its corporate brothers and sisters
profited by helping to create the supposed
menace not so long ago. Why would GE's
media outlets give you the facts? Facts interfere
with the bottom line. Here is your bottom line. This country is headed to war with a nation we
armed in the first place for a tidy corporate profit,
despite the fact that there is no evidence that
nation is a threat anymore. Beyond the tens of
thousands of civilian deaths this war will bring
to the people of Iraq, beyond the potential for
hundreds or thousands of American casualties,
beyond the vastly increased threat of stateside
terrorism this will cause, yet another tidy
corporate profit will be made. Simultaneously,
corporations and our government collude to
keep average Americans from being able to call
to account those who poisoned children during
40 years of profitable manufacture of what
appears to have been a neurological poison. 2001 was an abominable year, to say the least.
2002 was not much better. As we stride towards
the brave new year 2003, a moment of pause
should be taken. Is this the country you want? Is
this the government you want? Is this the world
you wish to leave for your children? The New Year is meant for resolutions.
Consider yours carefully, and keep it after you
make it.
B
Baerwald
(view)
..... the legislation to create a Homeland Security
Department to defend the nation against
terrorism was graced with a number of strange
amendments. Oddest among them was an amendment
protecting the pharmaceutical corporate giant
Eli Lilly from any and all lawsuits pertaining to
their manufacture of thimersol, a mercury-based
preservative for childhood vaccines produced by
Lilly for 40 years that has been connected to the
development of autism in children. Thousands
of families seeking redress for the neurological
disorders their children suffer have been sent
packing, because Lilly has a contract with the
U.S. government to provide vaccines against
biological weapons. One hopes thimersol is not
included in the processing this time around. Early in 2002, Bill Frist tried to get protection for
Eli Lilly from these suits attached to legislation
that would increase the availability of vaccines to
average Americans, but this attempt was
thwarted by Senator Edward Kennedy. The
Homeland Security legislation mysteriously
found itself amended to carry the Lilly litigation
protections, written in language virtually identical
to Frist's original attempt. The bill passed, and
no one in Washington DC is willing to take
responsibility for it. Frist, whose ties to the
corporate healthcare industry are blood ties,
whose family made its fortune through the
massive Hospital Corporation of America HMO,
who helped scuttle the Patient's Bill of Rights,
whose book was promoted and distributed
vigorously by Eli Lilly, denies all knowledge. The White House likewise denies any
knowledge of the author/sponsor of the Lilly
amendment. This stretches belief, considering
the ties the Bush administration has to the
pharmaceutical giant. George Herbert Walker
Bush sat on the Lilly Board of Directors during
the late 1970s, appointed by the father of Bush
Sr's. vice presidential candidate, Dan Quayle,
who owned controlling interest in the
corporation. Bush Sr. was personally ordered by
the Supreme Court to stop lobbying the IRS on
behalf of Lilly for tax breaks in 1982. The Bush
family has been substantially invested in Eli Lilly
stock for years. White House Budget Director Mitchell Daniels is
a former Lilly executive. Disgraced Enron CEO
Kenneth Lay also sat on the Lilly Board of
Directors, until he was forced to resign in
disgrace in December of 2001 after his
company exploded in a blizzard of fraud and
deceit. During the 2002 election cycle, Eli Lilly
gave more campaign money - $1.6 million -
than any other pharmaceutical corporation, 79%
of which went to Republican candidates. The
Lilly amendment that found its way into the
Homeland Security bill in the immediate
aftermath of that election can be seen for what it
is: a payoff. These are facts in the public record as we roar
into the brave new world of 2003. These are
facts that the mainstream television media will
not share with you; understand that NBC and
MSNBC, for one example, are owned by General
Electric, one of the largest defense contractors
on earth. General Electric stands to make
incredible profit from a war with Iraq, despite the
fact that its corporate brothers and sisters
profited by helping to create the supposed
menace not so long ago. Why would GE's
media outlets give you the facts? Facts interfere
with the bottom line. Here is your bottom line. This country is headed to war with a nation we
armed in the first place for a tidy corporate profit,
despite the fact that there is no evidence that
nation is a threat anymore. Beyond the tens of
thousands of civilian deaths this war will bring
to the people of Iraq, beyond the potential for
hundreds or thousands of American casualties,
beyond the vastly increased threat of stateside
terrorism this will cause, yet another tidy
corporate profit will be made. Simultaneously,
corporations and our government collude to
keep average Americans from being able to call
to account those who poisoned children during
40 years of profitable manufacture of what
appears to have been a neurological poison. 2001 was an abominable year, to say the least.
2002 was not much better. As we stride towards
the brave new year 2003, a moment of pause
should be taken. Is this the country you want? Is
this the government you want? Is this the world
you wish to leave for your children? The New Year is meant for resolutions.
Consider yours carefully, and keep it after you
make it.
posted 2003.01.04
posted on January 4th 2003
-
The good looking unknown Southerner Sen. John Edwards – PatBrown on January 4th, 2003-
Re: The good looking unknown Southerner Sen. John Edwards – baerwald on January 4th, 2003-
Re: The good looking unknown Southerner Sen. John Edwards – PatBrown on January 4th, 2003-
Re: The good looking unknown Southerner Sen. John Edwards – baerwald on January 4th, 2003-
It is a matter of trust – PatBrown on January 4th, 2003-
Re: It is a matter of trust – Dan on January 5th, 2003-
Re: It is a matter of trust – PatBrown on January 6th, 2003
Re: It is a matter of trust – Eugene on January 6th, 2003
Re: It is a matter of trust (more on smoking gun) – Dan on January 6th, 2003-
Re: It is a matter of trust (more on smoking gun) – PatBrown on January 6th, 2003-
Re: It is a matter of trust (more on smoking gun) – Dale on January 7th, 2003-
Reagan paved the way – PatBrown on January 8th, 2003-
A Statist Dunderhead and a song – baerwald on January 8th, 2003-
Re: A Statist Dunderhead and a song – Kevin g on January 8th, 2003-
Re: A Statist Dunderhead and a song – Dale on January 8th, 2003
Hooray for love! – Robert on January 8th, 2003-
Re: Hooray for love! – leroybrown on September 20th, 2006
Re: A Statist Dunderhead and a song – PatBrown on January 9th, 2003
Re: It is a matter of trust (more on smoking gun) – MJG on January 7th, 2003-
Re: It is a matter of trust (more on smoking gun) – Dale on January 7th, 2003-
Re: It is a matter of trust (more on smoking gun) – MJG on January 7th, 2003-
Re: It is a matter of trust (more on smoking gun) – Dale on January 8th, 2003-
Re: It is a matter of trust (more on smoking gun) – MJG on January 8th, 2003
Re: Oil Jumps the Pond – MJG on January 9th, 2003
John Kerry – Peter T. on January 5th, 2003
Re: The good looking unknown Southerner Sen. John Edwards – Eugene on January 7th, 2003
Robert Byrd comparison faulty... – EEE on January 4th, 2003
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
