PS You may be right Pat, in that someone is supporting Mrs Sheehan, someone(s) with an agenda, wouldn't surprise me at all, BUT, what about what she is saying is false? We were lied to in order to justify this action.

Pat wrote: Funny Funny so I guess you are saying it is ok to outright lie about something because it suits the cause?

Is that not what our President did? The one you support unflinchingly? The one who got Powell to tell the UN about the biological WMD's, I believe his daddy's Admin. provided Saddam, while others in his Admin. made up story's of present dangers that they knew did not exist? Cause once we're in, we're in, and the profits flow.

Speaking of which Pat, you invested in Haliburtion? Or any of the other big players profiting from this farce? I'm not expecting an answer, I just mention it as a possible source of motivation on your part as I can't understand your rationalizing the President's lies. You're not one of those people who actually see GW Bush as some sort of Messiah figure, as in Jesus, are ya? If so, snap out of it!

Pat wrote: No it is rather pathetic to use your own child to forward an agenda.

Are we to suppose you mean programs such as Amber Alert are pathetic and shouldn't have gone forward because the parents used their own child as an example in order to forward their agenda of minimizing the grief and outcome for other childern and their parents? Just a thought.

C'mon people, pile on this idiotic statement! I can't think of others, but I know there are more examples where pathetic parents initially whored their childs name for some, at least seemingly, good cause. MADD perhaps, in the beginning. Isn't there a pedofile or stalker notification law named after another dead little girl?

All things being equal Pat, I'll support you to the end, to put your foot in your mouth, any way you like. I believe in freedom of speech, but you definately shouldn't've put that on the record.

LOL, be well brother!!!